1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Misha Larkins [42]
3 years ago
13

Which best explains how brutus underestimates marc antony

History
2 answers:
atroni [7]3 years ago
4 0
4 or 2. I am learning about Caesar in history rn
sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago
4 0

Marc Antony was a master manipulator, and Brutus too naive to perceive that, Brutus idealism makes him to see Marc Antony only as a limb of Caesar's power, a follower of Caesar without ambitions of his own, and even allows him to give a speech at Caesar's funeral, which actually causes a riot against them.

Thereby the one that fits better is <em>(3)</em>

You might be interested in
American revolution, french revolution, and glorious revolution similarities
agasfer [191]

Answer:

The Glorious Revolution, the American Revolution, and the French Revolution were all rebellions against monarchs. The Revolution commenced as the the lower class of France despised the government who did nothing for them. The Glorious Revolution began similarly as they both wished to overthrow the king, but in this case, the Parliament was the main victim rather than the people. The American Revolution did lead to a democratic government, while the French revolution implemented many elements of democracy, such as universal civil and political rights.  Like the American Revolution, the Glorious Revolution involved substantial intervention by a foreign power: In the Glorious Revolution it was the Dutch, who sort of quietly invaded England, while in the American Revolution it was France which supported the American colonists.

Explanation:

(ง •_•)ง

8 0
3 years ago
In the nineteenth century, the popular European view of sub-Saharan Africa was that the area had been uncivilized and was only b
Allushta [10]

Answer:

I do not agree.

Explanation:

The arrival of the British in sub-Saharan Africa is part of European Colonialism, widespread in various parts of the world, with the aim of exploring and dominating a region and all the resources available in it.

It is common to hear that colonization was a blessing for the life of the colonies because it took culture, religion and modenity to a region considered "wild" and "inadequate". However, we can say that colonization was not a blessing anywhere, since in these regions the adoption of European culture and religion was imposed in very violent and authoritarian ways.

All colonies, including sub-Saharan Africa, already had a population established and organized according to their customs and religion. This population was different from what Europeans considered "civilized", but we cannot deny, that the natives had their own type of civilization that functioned efficiently between their citizens and their territory.

However, Europeans considered themselves the owners of the truth, and the only ones endowed with knowledge and education. They totally ignored native civilizations and their cultures, considering them wild and impure, which needed European society to put them in what was right. They used this concept to justify all the violent exploitation and acculturation that the natives went through, because they believed that God had given them the mission to "fix" the peoples and end the civilization that was established in the place, without any consideration.

4 0
3 years ago
A key reason that the u.s. declared war on great britain in 1812 was
Kaylis [27]
<span>The War of 1812 was a conflict fought between the United States and the United Kingdom and their respective allies. Historians in Britain often see it as a minor theatre of the Napoleonic Wars; however, in the United States and Canada, it is seen as a war in its own right.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
I need help pleaser
Sophie [7]
The answer is C for #12 and B for #13
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the period in Japan's history in the late 19th century when imperial rule was restored known as?
slavikrds [6]
The answer is Meiji period also known as Meiji Restoration.


This was a major event in Japanese history that restored the Imperial rule over all of Japan. It is named after the Emperor Meiji.

The <span>Meiji period is usually defined between 1868 - 1912 which also saw nation-wide social and economic reforms.</span>

The <span>Meiji period was critical in bringing advanced learning and scientific knowledge to the Japanese society.</span>



6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to islam, when and where did muhammad first receive words from allah?
    12·1 answer
  • Which term describes the position held by many Americans in 1800's that it was God's will the United States expand its borders?
    5·2 answers
  • Which best explains why many americans criticized the spanish-american war?
    9·2 answers
  • Why is the Suez Canal Crisis Important?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the entertainment industry contribute to the u.s. war effort during ww2
    8·2 answers
  • What was the effect of Plessy v. Ferguson in the United States? answer.com
    10·1 answer
  • Why was the banking industry under investigation by the Nye Committee in 1934?
    9·2 answers
  • What was hitlers goal in ww2?
    7·2 answers
  • HURRY! What were the 3 "accomplishments" of the early 1st Continental Congress?
    12·1 answer
  • What city in the world was a hot spot for the
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!