<span>The question is asking us to choose among the options. The background is that "The British Empire once controlled modern-day India. While many British historians once defended Great Britain's Right to rule over foreign colonies, British historians today largely take a negative view of such colonialism. Which of the following best explains why this change in interpretation might have occurred?" Here, the major reason is that the values changed - before, people believed in the superiority of white people while now it is believed that all people are equal. This means that they have different subjective options that influence how they see the events - biases. So the best answer is:
B. Historians today have different biases than previous historians.</span><span />
Answer: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision in favor of Johnson. The high court agreed that symbolic speech – no matter how offensive to some – is protected under the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Answer:
60 cents
Explanation:
the 4th row's dot is placed at 60 on the cost in cents column
Answer:
Music is a form of language so using that to influence people would be no different than how a movie or show could influence someone.
Explanation:
Music is essentially a form of language that allows people to communicate with each other and share experiences. Music can enhance and influence mood and emotions. A Penn State study carried showed that people's emotions became more positive after they listened to music.
Music improves intelligence, memory and behavior. It alleviates anxiety and promotes immunity. Music also makes people happy and productive; however, explicit references to drugs and violence in music contribute to negative and risk behaviors. Music affects society because of its positive and negative influence on some of its members. But it can also do the exact opposite depending on the type of music as well!
Answer:
If we refer to the America's as the "New World", we incinuate that the Native Americans weren't really important. WHen the tech. savvy Europeans came over, they regarded themselves as superior. Calling the already existing civilization inferior and killing them off was messed up. Instead, the story could have been told as the Europeans came over to an already established civilization, ruined it, and took the place over. It wasn't "New", it was pretty old. It just wasn't as developed.
Explanation:
