A subatomic particle with a positive charge is a proton
Answer:Select all the correct answers.
Which two concerns regarding weapons of mass destruction does the National Nuclear Security Administration deal with in collaboration with the United Nations?
the misuse of weapons of mass destruction by rogue nations
terrorists obtaining weapons of mass destruction
advances in weapons of mass destruction by Russia
nuclear testing by China
maintenance of weapons of mass destruction in Europe
Explanation:
During this part of the proofreading<span> procedure, you should search for errors in spelling, word usage, grammar, and punctuation. After all, a poorly </span>written<span> paper cannot possibly communicate its message properly to the reader. ... Editing is not just the icing on the cake; it is an essential part of the </span>writing<span> process.</span>
Answer:
Cool
Also...
Chance to win 50 points
Hi, so I have my horse show on Saturday. So I am doing a little giveaway. If you guess what place I come then you could win 50 points!! If you guess the closest you will win! You can comment or answer on this post. There are 8 people competing including me. Good Luck!
Answer:
<u>Claim:</u> the voting age should be lowered to 16 years old.
<u>Opposing claim:</u> some people are against it because they believe that 16 years olds can not make informed decisions and are going to vote according to whim or how their parents tell them to vote.
<u>Counterclaim:</u> lowering the voting age is more likely to produce a better-informed body of voters since school can help them with courses for such thing.
Explanation:
The claim in this text is that the voting age should be lowered since young people deserve to have a say in the direction of the country. Some of the reasons supporting this claim are that 16-year-olds are mature enough for this decision in contrast with teenagers of previous generations as shown in studies. Also, they are more informed and competent than adults.
The opposing claim states that 16 years olds are not well informed, and they will vote according to what their parents tell them to vote or without consciousness. There are no investigations in the article that support the opposing claim.
The counterclaim says that as 16-year-olds are still in school, the education system can develop instruction courses to teach them about the candidates. As they have the right to vote, students will be motivated to learn about this topic.