<span>Let's look at the various options and see which one makes sense.
a.kings evenly distributed items.
* This option would assume that every place prior to money being invented had a king. That doesn't make sense, so this option is wrong.
b.merchants and customers bartered.
* This option works. I have X and want Y, you have Y and want X. Let's trade. Or perhaps you have Y, but want Z. But that 3rd person over there is willing to trade Z for X, so between the 3 of us, we can each get what we want by trading what we have an excess of. Rather cumbersome, but it worked prior to the development of money. This is the correct choice.
c.individuals were self-sufficient.
* No man is an island unto himself. No one have every skill they need to live. So this is a bad choice.
d.priests evenly distributed items.
* The priests would have liked this option, but it too is a bad choice.</span>
It started when people decided to have off-spring and then then decided they didn't want to anymore once it was to late.
A) A turning point in the Civil War.
Answer:
Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate, as stated in the Constitution. The names of potential nominees are often recommended by senators or sometimes by members of the House who are of the President's political party. The Senate Judiciary Committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for each nominee. Article III of the Constitution states that these judicial officers are appointed for a life term. The federal Judiciary, the Judicial Conference of the United States, and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts play no role in the nomination and confirmation process.
Explanation:
