Assumptions are made about Oliver’s character in Mr. fang’s court is Like Brownlow, and dissimilar to the English legitimate framework, the Maylies have confidence in absolution and thoughtfulness.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Dickens utilizes these characters, who accept that Oliver is inherently acceptable however naturally introduced to an awful domain, to show that indecencies can be battled by improving the material states of the poor as opposite to by rebuffing them. Oliver winds up with what's left of his legacy, is legitimately received by Mr. Brownlow, and lives not far off from the Maylies. Everyone lives joyfully ever after.
The Puritan communities that settled the United States were often escaping religious persecution in England, and part of their motivation for moving to the new continent was to gain freedom of religion. Therefore, they were interested in establishing a degree of separation between the state and the Church. They established congregational independence, which meant that the government could not intervene in the affairs of the congregation. Moreover, ministers were barred from holding public office.
However, this did not mean that Puritans believed the separation should be absolute. The government and the church were just two mechanisms to carry out the teachings of the Bible. Church attendance was mandatory and all citizens were taxed to contribute to the needs of the church.
Answer:
personification and I think simile
Explanation:
personification is giving non-human things human-like traits. His soul cannot wrap itself around darkness - it's impossible
it might also be a simile because it is comparing the soul to a grament using like or as.
Answer:
If you did sign up to be charged, then why are you complaining.?
Explanation:
