Answer:
Violation of the Sixth Amendment right
“to have the assistance of counsel,”
according to the ruling in Gideon v.
Wainwright (1963). May depend on state law. _e Supreme
Court held in Kelo v. New London (2005)
that the “public use” required by the Fifth
Amendment when government takes
property is satisfied if property taken for
private redevelopment is for“ public
benefit.” In reaction to this ruling, several
states have passed laws forbidding the use
of eminent domain for redevelopment.
Violation of Eighth Amendment
protection from “cruel and unusual
punishment.”
Violation of Third Amendment, which
reads “No soldier shall, in time of peace be
quartered in any house, without the consent
of the owner.”
No violation, according to the ruling in
Owasso Independent School District v.
Falvo (2001).
Violation of Second Amendment “right of
the people to keep and bear arms,”
according to the ruling in District of
Columbia v. Heller (2008). May be a violation of First Amendment
“freedom of speech.” In upholding
students’ right to wear plain black
armbands in silent protest of the
Vietnam War, the Supreme Court held in
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) that school
officials may restrict student expression that
would “materially and substantially”
disrupt school discipline.
Explanation: