How about Neko? Can that work?
Answer:
c. It creates differentiation between each part through the use of dimension and scale.
Explanation:
<u> Symmetry is a visual representation that is the same on both sides</u>. <u>On the middle of the image is an imaginary or real mirror line, and on either side of it, the object or picture is the same, only reversed as if in the mirror. </u>
In art, symmetry is beneficial because it gives a sense of harmony and balance, making it more appealing to the observer.
If the parts of the image are different, the image is not symmetrical. <u>This is why the statement under c) is not describing symmetry – it should not have differentiating parts that vary in size and measurements. </u>
The statement under c. is likely describing asymmetrical balance, which creates harmony through the lack of symmetry and various shapes and sizes.
Answer: See attachment.
Explanation: Start on F, end on F. Sharps in front. 13 notes.
Answer:
- Economic approach
Explanation:
The economic approach is elucidated as the approach that lays emphasis on creation, allocation(distribution), and its consumption of any kind of artwork or creative product.
As per the question, the 'economic approach' to the creative industries like film industry would deal with the 'formation of the studio' that reflects the creation process, 'the distribution' would mirror the 'allocation' process, and 'exhibition and rise of the industry' would exemplify the consumption process by the viewers. Thus, the <u>'economic approach'</u> of film history would address these aspects.
If you mean what his most common name is, he is often known as "Caravaggio"!
Hope this helps!
