1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna [14]
3 years ago
12

What was NOT an individual right represented in the Magna Carta?

History
1 answer:
STatiana [176]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

b

Explanation:i just KNOW

You might be interested in
Explain why the northern earls revolted against Elizabeth I in 1569
marissa [1.9K]

Answer: The northern earls wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead.

Explanation: the Northern Earls had become enraged over a number of issues that it led to the Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569 and this was one of the issues The northern earls wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead.

With communication being so difficult during the reign of Elizabeth, it was very difficult to govern such as large country and ensure that everyone was doing what they were supposed to. As a result of this many people in the North of England were still Catholics. This counted against the Northern nobles who remained loyal to Catholicism, when Elizabeth became Queen. Elizabeth as a Protestant promoted Protestants to key government positions of power.

During 1569, the Northern Earls had become enraged over a number of issues that it led to the Revolt of the Northern Earls in 1569. The Earls, first and foremost disagreed with Elizabeth about religion. They wanted Catholicism restored in England, instead of the Protestant Church which existed instead. Secondly, as a result of their Catholicism they had lost a great deal of influence at Court and this had annoyed many. In addition to this, Elizabeth’s lifestyle choices provoked the Earls as she refused to marry or to name and heir, leaving the future of the Kingdom in doubt.

There was however a solution to all of their problems. They had Elizabeth’s cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots as a figurehead who could replace Elizabeth. By replacing Elizabeth as Queen, Mary would be able to restore Catholicism, return the Earls to a position of influence and marry another Catholic to ensure the safety of Catholicism in England.

The key figures in the plot were Thomas Percy, the Earl of Northumberland; Charles Neville, Earl of Westmorland and Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk. Both Neville and Percy had lost position at court, and Norfolk too felt displaced as a result of the younger Protestant nobles which Elizabeth doted on.

It can be argued that the Revolt of the Northern Earls was a religious dispute, as the Earls wanted the restoration of Catholicism in England. Elizabeth had appointed James Pilkington as Archbishop of Durham in 1561. Pilkington was a Protestant and his appointment was supposed to stamp out Catholicism in northern England. Pilkington was harsh in his methods, and instead of turning the masses to Protestantism, the opposite occurred with many turning away from Protestantism and embracing Catholicism more fully.

However, some have argued that the Revolt was in fact a political problem rather than a religious one. Many of the Earls had felt displaced at court and a result began to detest Elizabeth. For Percy, the appointment of Sir John Forster as the Earl in charge of protecting England’s borders with Scotland cut deep. Many Earls did not like the influence and power that many ‘newcomers’ had over Elizabeth. In addition to this, Elizabeth refused to have an heir to succeed her. The Earls wanted to replace Elizabeth with Mary, Queen of Scots which would have ensured that the succession was secure. Mary, would marry the Duke of Norfolk and create an heir resulting in stability for England.

5 0
3 years ago
What has been a serious case of division among the nations of Eastern Europe?
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

The answer to the question: What has been a serious case of division among the nations of Eastern Europe, would be: A: Ethnicity and C: Religion.

Explanation:

Almost from their very creation there has been a lot of issues that have driven the countries from Eastern Europe into constant conflict. One such issue has been ethnicity, given that there has been, historically, a perception on the inferiority of certain ethnic groups by others, even within the countries themselves. One such example is the ethnic persecutions in conuntries like Serbia, or in Bosnia. Ethnicity, in most of these countries, is seen as a point of conflict, and it has driven a lot of the massacres, and wars, that have ensued. Another issue has been religion, especially given the vast amount of influences that these lands have received throughout history. However, Eastern Europeans do not accept differences of religion, and it is known that they do not accept Judaism, or Islam, despite having had influences from both. Because these religious minorities exist within the countries, many conflicts have arisen when the governments of these Eastern European nations, have wished to eradicate them. This is why these are the two main issues that have caused constant problems in Eastern Europe.

4 0
3 years ago
How long did Abbasid rule last?
kompoz [17]
 it was for more than 500 years
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
West Florida tried to become part of what other state
Paraphin [41]
It was <span>Mississippi, and <span>Alabama believe i hope im not wrong
HAPPY VALENTINES DAY
</span></span>
5 0
3 years ago
Discuss how New Deal legislation continued to expand the role of the federal government​
Assoli18 [71]

New Deal Legislation was incredibly impactful in terms of the expansion of the Federal government in that the United States Federal government was, for the first time, heavily involved in the national economy and was involved in the private market in a way that they never were before.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is not a branch of
    12·1 answer
  • How did ronald reagan modify the resolute desk?
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement about the homestead act of 1862 is NOT true?
    7·1 answer
  • What was true of the difference between the north and south after 1829?
    15·2 answers
  • What 7 things change supply?​
    9·1 answer
  • What countries were given sections of Germany at the Potsdam Conference ​
    8·2 answers
  • 1. In the late twentieth century, liberals believed that
    5·1 answer
  • The cartoon above demonstrates what aspect of life before the French Revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • the screenshot is talking about the abolitionists era. please help with this! :) | no links!! p.s. will give brainliest !
    9·1 answer
  • Agrarian and slave states would not sign the Constitution unless ___.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!