Answer:
From google:
A serious drawback of telegraph devices was that they lacked quality in communication, which is why when the telephone came about – invented by Alexander Graham Bell in 1876 –
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
- African-American poet
- newspaper columnist
- “The Weary Blues”
- Harlem Renaissance
All of these are describing (B) Langston Hughes.
<u>Explanation:</u>
“Langston Hughes” was a social activist, African-American Poet, novelist and columnist from Missouri. He was one of the main writers and the one who thought about 'Harlem Renaissance'. This was an "African-American artistic" movement who celebrated 'black' life and culture.
He wrote his first "famous" poem when he was only seventeen. “Weary Blues” is one of the famous poems written by Hughes, where he expresses his loneliness and uncertainty about future and present. His sad inner self is revealed in this poem.
To Thoreau's it means prioritising one's conscience over the law, hence it is humanity first.
<h3>What is Meant by Civil Disobedience ?</h3>
In simple terms, it is used to describe refusal to obey the law, even though an individual knows that is illegal, yet chooses to do the wrong thing.
In other words, it can be known to mean peaceful protest.
Learn more about Civil Disobedience here:
brainly.com/question/1211261
#SPJ1
Answer:
This baseline analysis focuses first and foremost on immigration's direct effect on the economy through the addition of workers to the labor force. At the most basic level, immigration increases the supply of labor in the economy. More labor means more goods and services being produced, so that national output (GDP) rises.
Immigration also affects the prices of the inputs that are used to produce these goods and services. Those inputs for which immigrant labor substitutes will suffer as the prices of their services fall. Simply put, "substitutes" means two things that are very similar to one another. As a homely example, red apples and green apples are almost perfect substitutes, so that an increase in the number of red apples would not only reduce the price of red apples, but also simultaneously lower the price of green apples by about the same amount. In the context of immigration, whereas we shall see many immigrants are unskilled laborers, the strong presumption is that immigrants are substitutes for domestic unskilled labor.3 Therefore, an increase in the number of immigrants will generally decrease the wages of domestic unskilled workers.
Immigrants are not substitutes for all domestic workers. A disproportionate number of immigrants are low-skilled relative to native workers, and so tend to be poor substitutes for workers other than the low-skilled—that is, they do not do the same things at all. In the jargon of economics, two factors that are not substitutes are called "complements." For a simple example, think of supervisors and production workers. Suppose that, for every 50 production workers, we need one supervisor. If we increase the number of production workers, we will need more supervisors and their wages will rise. An increase in the number of immigrants, then, will raise the wages of those domestic workers who are their complements. The common presumption is that skilled domestic workers are complements for immigrants, so that an increase in the number of immigrants will raise the wages of domestic skilled labor. Capital may also be a complement to immigrant labor, although the evidence on the complementarity of unskilled labor and capital is more ambiguous than that of skilled and unskilled labor. In summary, an increase in immigration flows will lead to higher incomes for productive factors that are complementary with immigrants, but lower incomes for factors that compete with immigrants.
