By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Dickinson most likely repeated the word
"passed" three times in this stanza because the words convey a sense
of steady motion.
To add, <span>Emily Elizabeth Dickinson was an American poet. Except for
Walt Whitman, Dickinson is now recognized as the most important American poet
of the 19th century. Dickinson was born in Amherst, Massachusetts.</span>
Explanation:
if I am right (it depends on who is right or wrong, you or the government) I would take them to court.
for example:
if the government wants to build a road across my house I bought and paid for and I have the legit papers to the house and I don't want them to but they're insisting and don't want to listen to me and my decision then I would sue them to court, I won't be afaid they would win because I have the right papers and the house rightfully belongs to me.
Hope this helps.
Good luck .
The way you know the subject of the sentence is plural is because it takes a plural verb. You can see that the subject of the sentence is <em>the ova </em>(plural for of Latin word <em>ovum</em>, <em />meaning egg cell), and the verb it takes is <em>undergo </em>(plural)<em>, </em>and not <em>undergoes, </em>which would be singular.
