1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatiyna
3 years ago
9

Is a nation ever justified in conquering other lands? Explain

History
1 answer:
Galina-37 [17]3 years ago
7 0
From a moral standpoint, no nation is ever justified to take other lands because the reason behind conquering other lands is greed and a sense of power over others. 
You might be interested in
This country severely restricted the rights of its nonwhite citizens under a policy called apartheid, but since 1997 has made pr
timofeeve [1]
<span>This country severely restricted the rights of its nonwhite citizens under a policy called apartheid, but since 1997 has made progress towards equalityThe country described in the sentence above is

South Africa 
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
By January 1940 the nazi had not yet invaded
Mars2501 [29]
Although your question is ambiguous as could be, I'll do my best to answer. The Nazi's had indeed invaded countries by Jan 1940, beginning with the Austrian "Anschluss" in 1938, they invaded Austria. Then following the Munich Agreement in 1938 invaded Czechoslovakia. It was when the Nazis invaded Poland on 1st Sept 1939, that Britain and France declared War. What followed was conned a "Phoney War" as neither the Allies nor Germany invaded any country. This came to an end in April 1940 when Germany invaded Netherlands, Belgium and subsequently France. So yes you are right to a degree that WW2 had not fully begun by Jan 1940. 

Hope I helped :) 
3 0
3 years ago
Which aspect of equal protection did the Supreme Court consider when it ruled against segregation in public schools?
iragen [17]

The answer is C. for apex

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I<br> Need help on that one right answer only
harina [27]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
The supreme court's ability to interpret the constitution is called
Colt1911 [192]
It's called a judicial review.
hope i helped:D
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did communication improve during the Qin dynasty?
    8·2 answers
  • What was Manhattan project
    12·1 answer
  • What aided scientists in deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphics during the 19th century?
    8·1 answer
  • equality for women has effected population growth because today an increasing percentage of women are
    13·1 answer
  • What was transported in the middle passage of the triangular trade?
    11·2 answers
  • Lester Frank Ward argued in his book Dynamic Sociology that government could regulate the economy, cure poverty, and promote edu
    6·1 answer
  • Would you rather travel back in time or into the future? Why?
    8·2 answers
  • A. Why did many American colonists oppose the rule of King George III? ​
    11·2 answers
  • The economy of the Gilded Age was characterized by
    12·1 answer
  • Cahokia, located near modern day St. Louis, was the principal settlement of one of the most complex societies that ever existed
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!