Answer:
1. parsimonious,
2. rigorously
3. evaluated
Explanation:
There are several principles behind in scientific explanations, including PARSIMONIOUS, which refers to using the fewest number of assumptions to reach a solution, RIGOROUSLY which refers to using falsifying methods to test hypotheses, and EVALUATED, which refers to whether the explanation can be verified or lead to specific predictions.
Hence, the correct answers are: PARSIMONIOUS, RIGOROUSLY and EVALUATED
Answer:
The two documents mentioned by Dr. Martin Luther King would be the U.S. Constitution and the 1954 Supreme Court Decision that outlawed segregation in public schools.
Explanation:
In Letter from a Birmingham Jail, MLK countered his critics who were calling his actions extreme and he drew attention to the need for action at a time when many Americans were passively condoning racism by remaining silent on the issue and failing to support those who were working for change. MLK appeals to documents at the end of his letter that are legitimately part of the US system like the Constitution and the 1954 Supreme Court decision against segregation to make the point that the segregation situation is unjust and against the law.
Federalist papers stated that the proposed constitution, therefore, is, in strictness, neither a national nor a federal Constitution, but a composition of both.
Federalist papers refer to the collective of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. This was published under the collective pseudonym "Publius". Its main motive is to advance the ratification of the constitution of the United States. It was written in the 1780s to persuade the voters of New York to adopt the constitution.
The Federalist papers were published primarily in two New York state newspapers. These are The New York Packet and The Independent Journal. It was mainly based on the proposed new constitution of the United States and the nature of the republican government. The papers represented a masterly defense of the new federal system.
Learn more about the Federalist papers: brainly.com/question/2111092
#SPJ4
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
Answer: The Tenure of Office Act was a United States federal law (in force from 1867 to 1887) that was intended to restrict the power of the president to remove certain office-holders without the approval of the Senate. The law was enacted on March 2, 1867, over the veto of President Andrew Johnson.
Explanation:
