Autobiographies focus on the history of a person's life written by that person.
The main conflict in the Oscar grant case is the killing of African-American man in the early morning hours of New Year's Day 2009.
<h3>What is conflict?</h3>
Conflict serves as a disagreement between two or more parties.
Oscar Grant III who was a 22-year-old and was a tragedy on the streets of Oakland and generated much conflict.
Learn more about conflict at;
brainly.com/question/24769299
According to Sections 27 and28, the procedure that the two methods of treating the sick have in common is Breathing on the patient.
<h3>How would you tell about the breathing process to a patient?</h3>
When a person or a doctor is said to inhale (breathe in) inside their patient nostrils or mouth, air tend to enters their lungs, and oxygen from that air is said to be transmitted or moves to your blood.
Note that At the same time, carbon dioxide, and other waste gasare said to often moves from the blood to the lungs and is then said to be exhaled (breathed out).
Hence, the The Europeans and Indigenous Americans both had used this methods in treating the sick.
So, According to Sections 27 and28, the procedure that the two methods of treating the sick have in common is Breathing on the patient.
Learn more about Indigenous Americans from
brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ1
Hello, This question is incomplete. The full question is:
When we arrived, however, the library was closed. About a dozen people were milling about the glass front doors, wearing puzzled expressions and muttering with frustration
Which best analyzes the quality of the evidence's support for the claim that the funding for the public library should be protected because the library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community?
A. The quality is good; the evidence supports the claim by using a personal example to show that there is clear community demand for the library's services
B. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the claim by showing a need, but it would be better if the writer had asked each person why they were frustrated.
C. The quality is poor; the evidence does not give an exact statistic to explain how many of the people were at the library to attend a program.
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Answer:
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Explanation:
In order to present a good support of evidence, the author must present data about the programs offered by the library, their quality, availability and the relevance they present. In order to know about these data, it would be important that the author had heard the public's opinion about the library's programs, since, as users, the public can offer a view with less bias.
