Answer:
1. imbalance of risk versus return
2. failure to diversify
3. poor management of risks
4. the bank's assets falls to below the market value of the bank's liabilities
5. funding issues
Explanation:
hope it helps!
The correct answer is: D. They believed that representatives were better able to vote on national issues than ordinary citizens were.
Explanation
The excerpt contrasts ancient democracies, that were characterized by tyranny and run by mobs, to the idea of a large government representation so as to demostrate that whenevever a group of people is assembled, no matter who is in it, they tend to make the wrong decisions, that is, decisions led by passion instead of reason as stated in the excerpt:
"<em>passion never fails to wrest the sceptre from reason".</em>
Moreover, Federalists wanted a strong national government, instead of granting the power to the states, and believed that only one person could represent 30.000 people.
Well it depends on which part of the middle ages you are looking at, if you are looking at the beginning, I would call it the dark ages due to the downfall of the Roman empire. If you are looking at the middle I would also call it the dark ages due to the famine and disease that were rampant. Its not toward the end of the middle ages we start seeing advances in culture start becoming more diverse. So in short I would call the middle ages the dark ages.
A <span>state might argue that an unfunded mandate violates its rights because the Constitution ensures that all powers not specifically given to the federal government are maintained by the individual states. </span>
