Answer:
Hey mate.....
Explanation:
This is ur answer.....
<em>A Picture is attached pls check!</em>
Hope this helps!
Brothers pls!
Follow me! ♡
The correct answer is B. Indirect characterization
Explanation:
When authors use indirect characterization they only explain the actions, words, and general behavior of characters to show the reader how the characters are, rather than directly describing the characters from their perspective (direct characterization). According to this, the narrator of The Canterbury tells will use indirect characterization because he will only explain the "words and dealings" of the characters through the characters "very phrases as they fell", which shows the narrator will not describe the characters directly but let their words and actions show how they are.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Read the sentence below and answer the following question:
BUT HE ANSWERED NOT A WORD; like the last column of some ruined temple, he remained standing mute and solitary in the middle of the otherwise deserted room. —Herman Melville, "Bartleby the Scrivener"
In the bolded section, how does the addition of "not a word" change the impact of this introductory clause?
A. It emphasizes the lack of response: no answer was given at all.
B. It emphasizes the reference to solitary later in the sentence: "standing mute and solitary."
C. It suggests the narrator needed something: even a non-verbal response would have worked.
D. It suggests the feeling of isolation the narrator feels: the room is deserted.
Answer:
The addition of "not a word" changes the impact of the introductory clause because:
A. It emphasizes the lack of response: no answer was given at all.
Explanation:
Notice that the question wants us to focus on the introductory clause. This clause starts with "But he answered," which begins in an affirmative way. This sort of tricks the reader into thinking an answer was given. When the author adds "not a word," we suddenly have a negative sentence. This abrupt change from positive to negative emphasizes the lack of response. It is more powerful than simply writing, "But he didn't answer." We now feel the full of impact of the character not saying single word.
The author would describe this moment in her life as one of discovery, a point in which she became aware of things that as a child she could not understand. A time of putting pieces of information, that did not seem to be related, together.
She conveys this perspective through her language by, first, establishing the moment: she is staring at her father after he reveales something she was not aware of, but it is evident by her father's answer that it was not hidden from her, she just didn't understand. Then she uses the phrase "the moment that I realized the deceit I had been living under" and relates it to childhood. Lastly, she presents several images that seem to be coming together: children drinking milk, contaminated cows, contaminated breasts, one breasted-women...
C . because it tell exactly what he does and who he is .
