The author is trying to establish the point that the food provided to the soldiers was of poor quality and in little quantity.
<h3>How can we identify this?</h3>
- The author shows how the food provided to the soldiers was compared to fodder, that is, food inappropriate for humans.
- The author shows how this food could be compared with the feeding of pigs, which highlights the poor quality of the food.
- The author reinforces how inappropriate food was consumed anyway, as it was all the soldiers had.
In the text, the author wants to draw attention to how the soldiers were neglected and fed in a precarious, unhealthy, and insufficient way, not being possible to compare it with food for humans.
This kind of food left the soldiers hungry and weak, preventing them from being able to fulfill their responsibilities as required.
In this case, the author satirizes food, trying to call attention to a change and showing the dissatisfaction of those who need to eat this way.
Learn more about satire:
brainly.com/question/20772859
#SPJ1
The coalition of various reform groups was called the Young Turks.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The factor that played in the United state enjoying economic prosperity during the roaring '20s was that the country did not incur in big amounts of debt during World War 1, as Europeans countries did. Indeed, the United States loaned big sums of money to Western European countries to support the war effort. That is why the United States could live a period of economic prospeity in those years called "the Roaring 1920s," a period in which people had money or could buy using credit all the things they needed or they liked.
Answer:
We know that all people of any caste , race etc are not similar. Different people are found everywhere. Thus we can say that all Nazis were not evil. Some would be good but , they were not exposed. Even some Nazis has helped the Jews , but they were very few
Answer:
D
Explanation:
limited individual reward
