a. The relationship increased because of the support from Protestant churches.
the Great Awakening affected the colonies by changing many people's attitudes towards religion. Before this revival, religious devoutness had been fading in the colonies. The revival movement undyingly impacted Protestantism as adherents strove to renew individual piety and religious devotion.
Hi. I think the details of what the author said were not included in your post. I researched and found similar question but with the additional information. Here's my answer:
According to the author, the conditions in Europe during 800's was chaotic. The Frankish Empire was disintegrated to federation of feudal lords, Church did not have power, knights forcing the peasants to pay taxes. Muslims controlled Spain.
The correct answer is Increased support for social reform in spite of regional resistance. Some of the social reform included public school for children; Declaration of Rights of the Women of the United States with the Suffrage movement; also the religious reform was important for the profound social reform.
<em>Declining political participation as a result of the Enlightenment</em> is wrong because democracy was broadened in early 1800, till then only Kentucky and Tennessee could elect and only white men and wealthy could vote, around 1820 eight states were participating in elections and other groups as free-men could vote, later with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and the 15th Amendment African-Americans and women were also allowed to vote.
This answer is wrong<em> Significant increase in protections for American Indians through new treaties</em>. Around this period many American Indians went to war to protect their land from the white invasions and expansion, many Indians were killed by the whites. Even there were around 368 treats between US government and American Indians from 1776-1886 most of the treaties were about land, but these treaties required the Indians to cede their lands, others to give an annuity for the territory loss, by the time Indians could not purchase American lands so the treaties did not protect the Indians.
The option <em>Rapid decline of political factions in light of an improving economy</em> is wrong because around 1829-1850 there was great grown with the Market Revolution, the improving of economy was not declined.
Spanish colonial caste system ensured that people of mixed race would wield the most power in early 19th-century revolutions.
The Caste System was made in colonial times to clarify blended race families to those back in Spain, but this racial progression remained input long after the Spanish had cleared out Latin America. The system was made by the Spanish to preserve their control and the prevalence of other racial bunches within the colonies. Within the colonial time, the Spanish American society had a pyramidal caste system with several Spaniards at the best, mixed-race within the centre, a huge populace of inborn individuals, and a little number of slaves as a rule of African beginning at the foot.
The Spaniards possessed the upper echelons of colonial society by holding all the positions of financial benefit and political control. In this way, there was a preparation for caste amalgamation, composed of generally uniform human sorts in traditions, thoughts, and social status, which would quicken more amid the Spanish-American Wars of Freedom. A social progression ruled at the beat was shaped by the "Spaniards"
Read more about the Spanish colonial caste system on:
brainly.com/question/10605531
#SPJ1
The main law regulating child labor in the United States is the Fair Labor Standards Act. For non-agricultural jobs, children under 14 may not be employed, children between 14 and 16 may be employed in allowed occupations during limited hours, and children between 16 and 18 may be employed for unlimited hours in non-hazardous occupations.[1] A number of exceptions to these rules exist, such as for employment by parents, newspaper delivery, and child actors.[1] The regulations for agricultural employment are generally less strict.
The economics of child work involves supply and demand relationships on at least three levels: the supply and demand of labor on the national (and international) level; the supply and demand of labor at the level of the firm or enterprise; the supply and demand for labor (and other functions) in the family. But a complete picture of the economics of child labor cannot be limited to simply determining supply and demand functions, because the political economy of child labor varies significantly from what a simple formal model might predict. Suppose a country could effectively outlaw child labor. Three consequences would follow: (1) the families (and the economy) would lose the income generated by their children; (2) the supply of labor would fall, driving up wages for adult workers; and (3) the opportunity cost of a child’s working time would shrink, making staying in school (assuming schools were available) much more attractive. In principle, a virtuous circle would follow: with more schooling, the children would get more skills and become more productive adults, raising wages and family welfare.20 To the extent that the demand for labor is elastic, however, the increase in wages implies that the total number of jobs would fall.
The labor supply effects are the basic outline of the logic that underlies almost all nations’ laws against child labor, as well as the international minimum age standard set in ILO Convention 138 and much of the anti-child labor statements during the recent protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank and International Monetary Fund. This model does describe in very simplified form the long-term history of child work in the economic development of developed economies. But in the short-term, the virtuous circle seldom occurs in real life as quickly as the simple, static model suggests. The reason for the model’s short-term failure is that child work results from a complex interweaving of need, tradition, culture, family dynamics and the availability of alternative activities for children.
History suggests that children tend to work less, and go to school more, as a result of several related economic and social trends. the political economy of a place plays at least as big a part as per capita income in determining the level of child labor there.
