When disagreeing with a premise, __________.

1 answer:

8 0

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true." When disagreeing with a premise, one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true.

You might be interested in

According to Newton's law of universal gravitation, which of these objects would have the strongest gravitational force?

emmainna [20.7K]

This one would be a queen sized bed

5 0

2 years ago

What was the message in freedom walk

VladimirAG [237]

Explanation:

Free software had remained a technological and an economic issue in the state of Kerala and it had been very successful in being so. A team of four people decided to take the fundamental principle of the freedom behind free software and take this message of freedom to the masses in Kerala. They decided to project free software as an empowering agent to change the lives of people and in solving social, environmental and technological issues. They wanted to take free software and the freedom behind it to the common man in Kerala.

For doing this they decided to follow the Gandhian concept of walking, and walk they did. The quartet -- Anoop John, Cherry George Mathew, Prasad S. R. and Sooraj K. -- decided to walk from one end of Kerala to the other end, covering 1200+ kilometers, and preach this message directly to people. They also decided to follow a simple lifestyle -- no posh food, no paid stays, eating from small hotels and utilizing only public places to rest and stay. They decided to start on the birthday of Gandhiji -- Oct 2 -- from Kasargode and end at Trivandrum on Nov 14 -- the birthday of another great Indian leader Jawaharlal Nehru.

The free software community in Kerala embraced this walk and successfully organized 49 formal functions including seminars, public meetings, formal receptions and media interactions during this journey. This was on top of the very large and uncounted number of interactions they had on their way with people they met on the roads. The smallest formal functions would have been ones where 10-15 people attended (e.g., Agricultural University, Padanakkadu) whereas the largest ones would have been ones where 500+ people attended (e.g., Reception at Baselious College, Kottayam, Reception at BCM College, Kottayam). The median attendance would have been around 30 per meeting. Mass media in Kerala also liked this campaign for its novelty and its message and covered the walk end to end. A detailed list of all the formal programs conducted by the freedom walkers is at http://www.freedomwalk.in/content/freedom-walk-list-of-conducted-programs.

More than half of the formal functions, 28 to be exact, were conducted in educational institutions where the freedom-walkers conveyed the message of freedom and exhorted the students to embrace this freedom. In some places they had the opportunity to address the entire institution including teaching, non-teaching staff, and students, e.g., Vocational Higher Secondary School, Irimpanam; whereas in some places they addressed only faculty members, e.g., Agricultural University, Padanakkadu; NUALS,Cochin. These occasions were also utilized to convey to these students that the Freedom Walkers were following the Gandhian principle of "being the change they wished to see in the world." We can hope that the determination and the will of the freedom-walkers would very likely have inspired at least a few in their audiences to take very strong and life-changing decisions around these ideas.

The meetings generally had 3 sessions: a) message about being the change we wished to see in the world, b) introduction to the concept of freedom in software, its underlying philosophies and how free software can change our world, c) how people can join the movement, how they can get help, how they can contribute to the movement and through this how they can build careers in free software.

The formal functions were also used as a means to get connections established between the educational institution and the local free software communities. Messages about the existence and the activities of local free software users groups were given with instructions on how to join and participate in these communities.

The walk, zig-zagging across Kerala to cover all the fourteen districts, also effectively brought together the local communities in these districts around a common need to organize and participate in the Freedom Walk. This has resulted in better networking between these communities as has been evident from the cross-list involvement of free software users in the FSUG mailing lists in Kerala.

The campaign was very novel in terms of the origin (non-governmental and purely community based), in terms of the organization (totally owned and distributively organized by free software communities locally), and in terms of the physical involvement (that of walking for 44 days). The quartet has photo-documented (with around 8000 photos) their complete journey and they have also blogged on a daily basis during these days. The blog and photos are available at http://www.freedomwalk.in. Freedom Walk concluded on the 14th of November at a public function organized by the free software users group Trivandrum and chaired by the IT Secretary of the Government of Kerala.

8 0

2 years ago

What is the setting of Act II of The Crucible?

Pavel [41]

According to the Text book It should be CC - the Proctors' home, eight days after the girls have begun to accuse people

Hope it helps

8 0

2 years ago

Identify the example in this passage where President Bush makes an allusion to America's past in fighting wars. (write it word-f

never [62]

Answer:

Before a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001, President Bush declared a new approach to foreign policy in response to 9/11: “Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated.” Bush declared that the United States considered any nation that supported terrorist groups a hostile regime. In his State of the Union speech in January 2002, President Bush called out an “Axis of Evil” consisting of North Korea, Iran, and Iraq, and he declared all a threat to American security. British and French allies did not receive Bush’s declaration enthusiastically because they believed Bush’s language to be overly aggressive.

These remarks later matured into the policies known as the Bush Doctrine, officially traceable to September 2002, when the White House released the National Security Strategy of the United States. The doctrine generally focused on three points. The first was preventive war in which the United States would strike an enemy nation or terrorist group before they had a chance to attack the United States. It focused on deterring any potential attacker. The second point was unilateral action in which the United States would act alone if necessary to defend itself either at home or abroad. The third point embraced spreading democracy and freedom around the world, focusing on concepts such as free markets, free trade, and individual liberty.

Reactions to the Bush Doctrine were mixed. Neoconservatives within and outside his administration strongly supported the idea of the United States acting on its own to ensure the country’s security and to protect the American people—preemptively, if necessary. Some opponents believed the doctrine was overly bellicose and its emphasis on preemptive war was unjust. Others believed the emphasis on spreading democracy around the world was naïve and unrealistic. As the situation in Iraq became increasingly unstable, the ideas behind the Bush Doctrine receded in prominence, even within the Bush administration.

Explanation:

https://millercenter.org/president/gwbush/foreign-affairs

press the link for more help

8 0

2 years ago

A formal letter should use

Ratling [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers