Answer:
2-It was bombed due to acts of war towards japan and dropped a five-ton bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima.. And then three more days later nagasaki was bombed which killed tremendous amount of people
3-They accept defeat 10 days later and they had to because if they didn't they will drop more bombs which encouraged them to accept defeat The surrender ceremony was held on September 2, aboard the United States Navy battleship, at which officials from the japanese government signed the Japanese instrument of surrender
4-The Manhattan project was started because German scientists had been working on a weapon using nuclear technologies and that Adolf Hitler was prepared to use it.The Manhattan Project was the code name for the American-led effort to develop a functional atomic weapon during World War II
5-During that time president Truman was accountable for everything but his main focus was not to attack civilization/agriculture but was entitled to destroy Japan's ability to make war.
6-No, they were not. The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral and this was not attended to using weapons knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu and it was clearly not mortal for the act of thought
Explanation:
He made a rule saying if you do not work you do not eat. hope that helps
The Assembly line
correct me if i’m wrong
Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
