Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Answer:
a:the plebeians revolts
Explanation:
Because of these revolts the plebeians guaranteed the legal validity of the laws formulated by the Tribunes of the Plebe, so that they were valid for all extension of the Roman dominions. This revolt ended a process of long-term political reform. Despite politically balancing Roman social groups, the cultural distinction between a patrician and a plebeian did not radically change.
I believe your answer is C correct me if I'm wrong. I hope this helps
Answer:
its a mixture of all but computers and IT
Explanation:
Washington's leading exports include aerospace products and parts, cement and concrete products, seafood products and computer software – with exports of both goods and services representing 18.3 percent of the state's total gross domestic product (GDP).
