Marx and Engels plan to close the economic gap by nationalizing the "means of productions" would result in the working class having control of this part of society. In this case "nationalizing" means that the means of production would be owned by the public as a whole rather than an individual. This would allow more citizens to make profit off of goods and services. This public ownership would help to make sure more people have a lot of money, rather than a select few.
The second statement discusses a perfect communist society and how it would be ideal for the citizens living in it. They argue that other countries would see how working for the common good would be beneficial. From there, they would adopt the system. Then, communism would spread like wildfire.
<span>The changes meant farms could no longer produce enough food.
Mark me brainliest.
Thanks!
</span>
Loyalty to old immigrants and discrimination against new immigrants is a very broad statement that makes it more correct. Consider that americans, or europeans in particular, wanted all the land they could get their hands on and didn't want to share any of it. As a result their desires were shown in nativism.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
C. very low economic growth
Explanation:
just answered incorrectly on a p e x (no idea why brainly censors a.p.e.x)
