Answer:
C. strategic, third-party logistics, warehousing, transportation, and location.
Explanation:
A logistics manager is an individual who is saddled with the responsibility of the entire or overall supply chain management of goods produced by an organization. They are usually responsible for the distribution and supply of goods through out the manufacturing and finished process of delivering to final consumers.
The five major decisions addressed by logistics managers are
1. Strategic.
2. Third-party logistics.
3. Warehousing.
4. Transportation.
5. Location.
Incomplete question. The options:
a) Yes, Though the author will probably not enforce his or her rights under this situation, Monic has technically violated federal copyright law.
b) No. Educators have a right under the "fair use doctrine" to make limited use of copyrighted materials.
c) Yes. Monic has technically violated federal copyright law by copying and distributing this original work.
d) None of the above.
Answer:
<u>b) No. Educators have a right under the "fair use doctrine" to make limited use of copyrighted materials.</u>
Explanation:
Based on the "fair use doctrine" in the United States, professor Monic did not violate copyright law from a legal standpoint.
Another interesting detail is the number of copies redistributed by Monica, only <em>"30 copies"</em>, and according to the provisions of the "fair use doctrine" that can be considered fair. Not forgetting also the substantial nature of copying, since only <em>"a passage"</em> from the novel is photocopied.
Answer:
Unilateral Mistake
Explanation:
In a contract between two parties, a unilateral mistake occurs when one party in the contract makes a mistake regarding cost, the definition of a term or word, or measurement. The outcome of such a mistake is usually a conflict between the two parties. To resolve this problem, the contract could be canceled (if the other party becomes aware of the mistake), or reformed (if only one party is aware of the mistake).
When Mark made a mistake about the cost of building the house for David, he made a unilateral mistake as the mistake was committed by him alone. David's refusal of the amended cost is resulting in a conflict that would likely lead to the cancellation of the contract.
he exchange of money and the receipt of the item is mutual consideration for the transaction. In every single agreement, there must be consideration in order for the agreement to be legally binding; it is a critical part of contract formation. ... In other words, each person in a contract must promise to do something.
Answer:
As the bank manager, Steve should be informed that the promissory note met all conditions and the case cannot be seen in the same light as a fraud case because the bank had no reasons to suspect any kind of fraudulent activity as everything was filled correctly and no sign of tampering on the note, it was a genuine and verified promissory note. Aside from the amount and signature, there was nothing in the note to show the agreement that both Steve and Henry had, which is not going above $5,000.
So the bank has the right to collect all its money from Steve, it is a form of negligence on the part of Steve to leave the amount blank which Henry took advantage of.
Although Steve could sue Henry for going above the amount they both agreed on.
