hi there again
your answer to this is
The Anti- Federalists had claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. that is why they didnt want a president at all.
i hope this helped you out again
have a great afternoon
Faithrawlins14
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In judging whether this is fair handling of the case, ask:
A. Is it fair to Eddie?
Youngsters have to learn to be responsible for their life. They know that for every action there is a consequence. In this case, it is the third time that this happened. So it is not new for him, and he really knew what he was entering. So he got what he deserves.
B. Is it fair to Best Buy?
Best Buy is a serious company with a good reputation in the market. It has to follow rules and regulations and respect the law. Eddie is a criminal and there are procedures to be followed.
C. Is it fair to society?
I think this is not a matter of fairness, but to obey the law that is the same to all. This application of the law allows people to live in harmony in society. Otherwise, everybody would act according to their interests and advantages.
D. Is it in the best interest of society to punish Eddie severely?
It is in the best interest of society to punish Eddie to give a clear message. It's the law. You have to obey it, otherwise, there would be chaos in society. Furthermore, it was not the first time Eddie committed a crime, it is the third time. He had his chances to improve his conduct and learn his lessons. He decided otherwise. And as I said, for every action there is a consequence.
The difference between the second and first generation of
Indochinese immigrants is they refuse the French culture. The
correct answer between all the choices given is the second choice. I am hoping
that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in
your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
There was wide spread public protested against John Jay and his treaty- this is an exception.
Option: A
Explanation:
John Jay's treaty was taken for bring the solution of everlasting dispute between America and Britain. In this treaty America was successful to built an economic policy upon which Britain kept faith and a mutual understanding was there in between these two countries.
Though the republican party suffered a lot from this treaty. They felt embarrassed as these two countries never in a a situation of sit together and draw a solution for their own. John Jay's treaty was successful. There was as such no public protest happened.
He was a an absolute ruler
