1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
15

CollegeSocial studies 43+22 pts John Locke's statement on rights pointed to 'life, liberty, and property,' while Thomas Jefferso

n's pointed to 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.' With the historical context in mind, analyze the differences in meaning between these two phrases. Then, provide an explanation for the reasons why you think 'property' was changed to 'the pursuit of happiness' in the Declaration of Independence. Response should be at least one paragraph in length.
WILL GIVE YOU BEST SCORE :)
History
1 answer:
ankoles [38]3 years ago
3 0
[I'm not gonna have a paragraph]
when Thomas Jefferson was writing the Declaration of Independence. He took the statement but he realize that he couldn't assure everybody to have property. So he said the pursuit of happiness, because of all the horrible and Intolerable Acts sugar acts and facts that were put on them during British rule. So the pursuit of happiness is that they will be able to be happy and do whatever they want within the law so they have more freedoms and they don't have to do things like taking soldiers anymore and they won't feel like they're suffering. And because they couldn't ensure that everybody was able to own land they changed it for that reason.
You might be interested in
[PLEASE ANSWER]
kotykmax [81]

Answer: Good Afternoon

I can help you if you can please tell me the questions listed Thank you very much

-Mariah Malave

Explanation: Many activists joined efforts to reform local government, public education, medicine, finance, insurance, industry, railroads, churches, and many other areas. Progressives transformed, professionalized and made "scientific" the social sciences, especially history, economics, and political science.

Hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did hunter-gatherers deal with their environmental conditions
Feliz [49]
 <span>also called </span>foraging culture, any group of people that depends primarily on wild foods for subsistence. Until about 12,000 to 11,000 years ago, whenagriculture<span> and animal </span>domestication<span> emerged in southwest </span>Asia<span> and in Mesoamerica, </span>all peoples<span> were hunters and gatherers. Their strategies have been very diverse, depending greatly upon the local environment; foraging strategies have included </span>hunting<span> or trapping big game, hunting or trapping smaller animals, fishing, gathering shellfish or insects, and gathering wild plant foods such as fruits, vegetables, tubers, seeds, and nuts. Most hunters and gatherers combine a variety of these strategies in order to ensure a balanced diet</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During World War II, the United States assisted Jews in Europe who were threatened by Nazi policies by
dexar [7]

we gave them land to have after the war was over so they can be separated


7 0
3 years ago
In South Carolina, society became more divided after the arrival of large numbers of...
VikaD [51]
Your answer should be French settlers.
3 0
3 years ago
Use the text to answer the question.
Alecsey [184]

This excerpt reflects that (c.) the document provides protections for English citizens but does not provide equal protections.

Magna Carta was a document issued in the 13th century and it established that everyone, even the monarch, was subject to the law. It was mainly designed to solve the problems that had arisen between the King and the rebel barons.<u> This excerpt shows that, although the document protects the English citizen that commits an offence, it does not offer the same protection that it offers to the man that belongs the highest class</u> <u>since it establishes that, unlike ordinary citizens, earls and barons can only be judged by people that belong to their same social class</u>. The reason why the document offers unequal protection is because <u>Magna Carta had been designed by the barons to ensure that their own rights were protected</u>.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The 13th, 14th, and 15 Amendments MOST impacted the rights of which group?
    5·2 answers
  • Congress voted to annex texas:
    14·1 answer
  • Why did many jews remain in nazi germany and within axis controlled areas of europe
    6·1 answer
  • Which is an example of the Second Great Awenking influence on society?
    11·1 answer
  • Although it wasn't the reason the Bantu had to migrate across Africa, this technology helped them become more powerful than othe
    8·2 answers
  • One method of increasing production is to utilize
    9·1 answer
  • What happens if regulatory policies for a business are violated? New business rules are created. Safety classes are mandated. Ad
    11·2 answers
  • Below is a digram of a hypothetical bill. Which of the following must be the missing legislative step in the diagram?
    8·2 answers
  • !!!!!!!PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the US join the war? Select all that applies
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!