It is many Japanese earned their living from the sea. Because Japan is an island nation, the sea has had a big influence on it. Many people fish, and a lot of native Japanese dishes are seafood based.
Buddhism actually did take hold in Japan, but that was not influenced by the geography; therefore the second one is right.
I hope this helped! (:
The feudalism system was kind of like conquering everything as your own(take the Japanese civil war for example) the decline of this lead to:
1.newer trade routes brought more wealth and job opportunities.
2. the serfs or peasants weren't being respected enough by the king and the crusader knights fought for their freedom.
3. peasants had a right to own land and prevent any merchants from taking it.
your answers should be the first one and the last one.
New England did not grow cotton, it was mainly grown in the Southern states of Georgia and Carolina colonies. The best explanation as to why the cotton was grown in the Southern colonies is because the Southern colonies has nutrient rich dense soil and mild weather.
The Immigration Act of 1924 produced highly discriminatory results because it set a max on how many immigrants could come to the US depending on what country they came from.
For example, there were many more opportunities for citizens from countries like Germany, Great Britain, and Sweden in comparison to individuals from Italy or Russia. Here are some numbers to support this claim:
Germany's Quota (aka amount that could come into US)- 51,227
Great Britain and Northern Ireland's Quota- 34,0007
Sweden's Quota- 9,561
Italy's Quota- 3,845
Russia's Quota-2, 248.
Answer:
The histography of ancient times is a complex study that needs to be examined from every possible angle to clear the picture of the past.
Explanation:
It is always a concern about the historians that to what extent they can remain unaffected from their surrounding while writing history. And ancient history was marked by despotic rule where any criticism about the head of the state and strong institution would immediately deal with harsh punishment. Moreover, the credibility of historians can be doubted when we study that they were dependent on the royal patronage and therefore have worked to legitimate the royal authority.