With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Answer:
He used an old culture of germs.
Explanation:
The chickens did not become ill. Pasteur reasoned the factor that made the bacteria less deadly was exposure to oxygen.
The context clues are important to know why the author included an anecdote about Judge Jackson’s experience with prejudice at her high school.
<h3>What is an anecdote?</h3>
Your information is incomplete as the story isn't given. Therefore, a overview will be given. It should be noted that an anecdote simply means a short amusing story about an individual or incident.
In this case, it's important to read and understand the story. Also, look out for the theme that's expressed in the story. This is important to know why the author included an anecdote about Judge Jackson’s experience with prejudice at her high school.
Learn more about anecdotes on:
brainly.com/question/24863956
To begin with Constantine turned into a Christian and quit oppressing them. Second Constantine chose to move to Byzantine which he at that point changed to Constantinople.
The primary Roman head to guarantee change to Christianity, Constantine assumed a compelling part in the decree of the Edict of Milan in 313, which announced religious resistance for Christianity in the Roman realm.
