The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although no options were attached we can say the following,
The punishment for Russian serfs who submit unlawful petitions complaining of their landlords was a harsh punishment by the whip and could be deported to the prison of Nerchinsk, to be jailed for life.
We are talking about the time of Russian Empress Catherine the Great, who got to the throne of Russia after forcing the abdication of King Peter III.
Internal problems motivated peasants and poor people to demand changes in servitude. That is why the government published a decree in 1767, where the Russian empire condemned serfs and poor people that initiated protests or rebelling asking for better living conditions.
While soviets rejoiced in the attainment of the sputnik system, Americans feared soviet advancements in science.
<h3>What advancements made Sputnik possible?</h3>
Sputnik made the possible to study the radio wave transmission and density of the atmosphere easy. He also supported the scientist to learn to track objects in orbit. He encourages testing satellite pressurization. This made pressure to America for advance of technology.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about advancements made Sputnik possible, click here:
brainly.com/question/13588207
#SPJ1
Northerners responded in many different ways to the Fugitive Slave Act, but the best option from the list would be "<span>A. Some northern states enacted legislation opposing it" was one of the major tensions leading up to the war. </span>
<u>The three main types of city governments are council-mayor (which can come with a strong mayor or with a weak mayor), council-manager, and commission (though very few cities actually have commission forms of government). Each of these has strengths and weaknesses.The strength of the commission form of government is that it is very democratic and it allows very close attention to be paid to each aspect of city government. In this form, one commission member is elected to oversee each major aspect of government. That person can give his or her undivided attention to that aspect of government. Its weakness, though, is that there is no central authority.In the council-mayor system, the strength is that you have an elected central authority. This allows one person to be responsible to the people for the whole city government. The main problem with this system is that you can have a mayor who is elected for his or her political acumen but who is a terrible manager. Such a person can significantly harm the way the city is run.</u><span><u>In the council-manager system, you take care of this problem. The manager is a professional who knows how to run a city. This makes this system efficient. The problem is that it is less democratic because the manager is not elected by the people.</u></span>
