Answer: b) Sensitivity analysis.
Explanation:
Sensitivity analysis is described as the assessment that reflects about strong condition of it.It works by describing the extent to which change or modulation can impact the values or model to become uncertain so that it can be split and place in the category source of uncertainty and related input.
Other options are incorrect because uncertainty analysis determines the uncertain property due to change.Probability analysis is carried out for evaluation of probability.Cost analysis is based on economic assessment.Thus, the correct option is option(b).
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
<span>new economic policies that threatened social equality.</span>
Is it just a bill, like a water or gas bill?
Answer:
In <u>New Jersey v. TLO</u>, he U.S. Supreme Court rules that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on <u>reasonable doubt/ suspicion</u>.
Explanation:
In New Jersey's Piscataway High School, a teacher discovered a student and her friend smoking cigarettes in the school lavatory which was a clear violation of the school rules. So, when the students were taken to the Principal's office and searched, they found other "illegal" items in her bag. The family of the TLO took the school to court, stating that it is illegal for them to conduct a search without a warrant. But when the court looked over the case, decided that for the greater interest of the safety of the school and of the individual, the school has the right to conduct warrantless searches at school based on "reasonable suspicion". This is in accordance to her denial of ever smoking but the discovery of the cigarettes in her pure said otherwise. Moreover, she was taken directly from the lavatory where she was caught on the act and thus, her claims were trashed.
Thus, the <u>court ruled in the New Jersey v. TLO case,school officials can conduct warrantless searches if they have reasonable doubt/ suspicion of any illegal activities within the school’s premises.
</u>
