Answer:
So the UN managed to assemble a combined military force of many different nations to hold back the North Korean army. This was possible because of the activity in the council by its member states, and because of the change of rhetoric since the beginning of the 20th century.
The League of Nations was formed as a predecessor to the UN and partly NATO, but it was wildly ineffective. None of the member states were willing to commit military forces to the council to enforce peace and it was all mostly influenced by the isolationism of the US and the appeasement and neutrality policy of the Allies. So basically the UN is a revamped version of the League of Nations because it is more effective and it is forcing member states to participate while the League of Nations did not manage to do that. And it is important to note that the North Korean crisis was stopped because of the military intervention of the UN. While the League of Nations would have done basically nothing if they still existed at that point.
Nothing like that had ever been created before in history.
<span>Employees in France have less motivating force to rapidly look for another position when they are out of a current job position since their joblessness benefits are significantly higher. The mentality is simple "who wants to look for another job when fired when you can get enough money to take care of your daily needs even as an unemployed person with unemployment benefits".Because of this, the government of France does everything it can with regard to labor to make sure that everything is balanced.</span>
Well, they wanted religious freedom and separation from the church of England. As well, America brought forth new opportunity, and new potential growth of an stable settlement which would soon turn into a city, than which would forth bring up a nation.
Answer:
option D
mark as brainliest answer
