1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fgiga [73]
3 years ago
7

How did Marcus Aurelius and Antoninus Pius differ?

History
2 answers:
gregori [183]3 years ago
8 0
Aurelius killed Christians, while Pius was good to his people and kept peace and this was the way Marcus Aurelius and Antoninus Pius differed from each other. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option. I hope this is the answer you were looking for and it has helped you.
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C. Aurelius killed Christians, while Pius was good to his people and kept the peace.

Explanation

Antonino Pio was a Greek emperor who ruled from the year 86 until the year 161, he was a magistrate during the rule of Hadrian and thanks to his reputation was chosen as the heir to the throne of Hadrian. His reign was characterized by the peace that was lived during those years because he invested the money of the empire in improving living conditions and instead of persecuting Christians, he protected them. On the other hand, Marcus Aurelius was a Greek emperor who ruled from the year 121 until the year 180. Unlike his adoptive father (Antonino Pio), as emperor of the Roman Empire, he led military forces to persecute Christians because they were believed to be immoral. So, the correct answer is C. Aurelius killed Christians, while Pius was good to his people and kept the peace.

You might be interested in
Which factor determines the organization of political parties at the local level
djyliett [7]

The correct answer is:

The state electoral map


In the city level they have a town committee made of the city districts ward/council district committee leaders.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why did the 1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance b
stepladder [879]

1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance between local, state and national goverment in the following way

Explanation:

  • The United States moved from dual federalism to cooperative federalism in the 1930s. National programs would increase the size of the national government and may not be the most effective in local environments. Cooperative federalism does not apply to the Judicial branch of the government.
  • Each level of government is dominant within its own sphere. ... Marble cake federalism – Conceives of federalism as a marble cake in which all levels of government are involved in a variety of issues and programs, rather than a layer cake, or dual federalism, with fixed divisions between layers or levels of government.
  • As a theory, dual federalism holds that the federal and state governments both have power over individuals but that power is limited to separate and distinct spheres of authority, and each government is neither subordinate to nor liable to be deprived of its authority by the other.
  • The first, dual federalism, holds that the federal government and the state governments are co-equals, each sovereign. In this theory, parts of the Constitution are interpreted very narrowly, such as the 10th Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Commerce Clause
  • The advantages of this system are that it protects local areas and jurisdictions from the overreach of the federal government. The framers of the Constitution were afraid that the federal government would have too much power, and this system was a means of preventing that situation from developing.
  • Historically, the definitive example of dual federalism is the United States. ... These states can check the federal government through judicial action. Europe, too, has a system of dual federalism, albeit set up with state traditions. The European Union (EU) is organized into a federalist government with limited powers.

8 0
3 years ago
The purpose of setting up two-house state legislatures was
GrogVix [38]
<span>The purpose of setting up two-house state legislatures was to be fair to both the more populus states and the less populus states, since the Senate benefits the latter, while the House benefits the former. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
By the time martin luther king jr. was assassinated, he had
Radda [10]
<span>been a civil rights leader for more than ten years.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(Please help Asap)
Lunna [17]

it's A, mississippi.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

:0]

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which minor party’s role in the 2000 presidential election contributed to the defeat of the Democratic party candidate?
    12·2 answers
  • What year was earth creted on
    13·1 answer
  • What events and dates marked the beginning and end respectively of the babylonian captivity?
    13·2 answers
  • The French were convinced to support the American war against the British after the Americans won the Battle of
    8·1 answer
  • 1. The free enterprise system is helpful because it allows for freedom.
    8·2 answers
  • Which was a factor that led to Bacon's rebellion
    9·1 answer
  • After World War II, both the United States and Soviet Union recruited the
    5·1 answer
  • PLS HELP ASAP! What do you think is the most important quality a historian should have? Be sure to explain your answer.
    10·2 answers
  • Department Function(job) Secretary(Leader) State Treasury War Attorney General
    6·1 answer
  • The working class in the industrial age were also known as the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!