Answer:
D. Formal
Explanation:
Let us examine each option carefully.
Every word contributes to the meaning of the sentence with no redundant or unnecessary words. This eliminates option A, i.e., 'wordy'.
The sentence is eloquent and does not have any breaks in its flow anywhere. Hence, it is not 'choppy'.
It is written in proper Standard English grammar, and is a complete sentence without any breaks or usage of vernacular or slang words, or any other causal mode of communication such as emoticons or short forms of words (contractions), which makes it a formal and not a casual sentence.
Answer:
When you're organizing, you're taking into account the contents of the notes, so whilst you are doing something as simple as organizing you are unknowingly using passive recall in order to remember what each sheet covers and the best order to place everything in.
Explanation:
Answer:
Criticism of socialism (or anti-socialism) is any critique of socialist models of economic organization and their feasibility as well as the political and social implications of adopting such a system. Some critiques are not directed toward socialism as a system, but rather toward the socialist movement, parties or existing states. Some critics consider socialism to be a purely theoretical concept that should be criticized on theoretical grounds (such as in the economic calculation problem and the socialist calculation debate) while others hold that certain historical examples exist and that they can be criticized on practical grounds. Because there are many models of socialism, most critiques are focused on a specific type of socialism and the experience of Soviet-type economies that may not apply to all forms of socialism as different models of socialism conflict with each other over questions of property ownership, economic coordination and how socialism is to be achieved. Critics of specific models of socialism might be advocates of a different type of socialism.
According to the Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises, an economic system that does not utilize money, financial calculation and market pricing will be unable to effectively value capital goods and coordinate production and therefore socialism is impossible because it lacks the necessary information to perform economic calculation in the first place. Another central argument leveled against socialist systems based on economic planning is based on the use of dispersed knowledge. Socialism is unfeasible in this view because information cannot be aggregated by a central body and effectively used to formulate a plan for an entire economy, because doing so would result in distorted or absent price signals. Other economists criticize models of socialism based on neoclassical economics for their reliance on the faulty and unrealistic assumptions of economic equilibrium and pareto efficiency. Some philosophers have also criticized the aims of socialism, arguing that equality erodes away at individual diversities and that the establishment of an equal society would have to entail strong coercion. Critics of the socialist political movement often criticize the internal conflicts of the socialist movement as creating a sort of "responsibility void".[citation needed]
In typical Hemingway style, the excerpt contains a number of abstract nouns and many adjectives. contains a large amount of punctuation and few adjectives and adverbs.
