I believe the answer is c) situational variables
Answer:
Explanation:
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
The correct answer is coupons and comparative shopping.
Coupons are commodities that give consumers a saving on the purchase of an item(s) at particular stores. These coupons help individuals to save money. Comparative shopping works in a similar way. However, instead of having a physical coupon to show, consumers can compare prices of goods from different stores using resources like newspaper advertisements or online databases.
Opportunity costs and marginal benefits have nothing to do with saving money. Rather, these deal with other economic principles like choosing between different options and the additional satisfication that a person gets from consuming more of a good.
Answer:
Bob claims that certain actions by the federal government and the state of Delaware infringe on rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution. These rights protect individuals and some corporations from government actions aimed at restricting individual liberties.
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. The bill originally came from James Madison in 1789, and came into force on December 15, 1791, after being ratified by 3⁄4 of the states.
The Bill of Rights limits the scope of action of the federal government and guarantees the American people rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, legal security and freedom of organization. The Bill of Rights also makes it clear that everything that is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution must be matters decided by the individual states and their inhabitants.
The answer is:
<span>- a "fair use" exception to the provisions of the act
- a violation of copyright law
- not a "fair use" exception to the provisions of the act
The difference in response is caused because it would depended so much on the use of the sampling.
If the sampling is used for commentaries or educational purpose, it would fall under the fair use exception, otherwise it would fall on violation of copyright.</span>
