1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leona [35]
3 years ago
7

Should welfare funding (including entitlements and other spending) be increased within the states? Examine both sides.

Advanced Placement (AP)
2 answers:
Step2247 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Social assistance funds are instruments of state budget and financial management. These should include revenue and expenditure for each state's set of actions, services, programs, projects, and welfare benefits.

I believe that welfare funds should be increased in states that show that this increase is necessary to promote the welfare of the population. As we all know, many states do not have the same economic stability as others, and these are the states that need an increase in the welfare fund in order to be able to provide a better life for citizens on social welfare.

However, in states with greater economic stability, the welfare fund should not be increased, but should be kept at a rate commensurate with the state's need.

Oduvanchick [21]3 years ago
4 0
I honestly believe to help your wellbeing that ,Under a block grant, proponents argued, states could shift the funds freed up when families left welfare for work to child care or other work supports, where need would increase.  States also could invest more in work programs to reflect the increased emphasis on welfare as temporary and work-focused. 
You might be interested in
Can someone please help me this is m second time doing this
SOVA2 [1]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The basaltic rock that forms volcanic mountains where mantle plumes reach Earth's surface is usually composed of what?
matrenka [14]
Fine-grained, dark-colored mafic minerals
4 0
3 years ago
What are the arguments against torture in David Luban's article, Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Bomb? Do you agree or disa
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

the self-conscious aim of torture is to turn its victim into someone who is isolated, overwhelmed and humiliated. Torture aims to strip away from its victim all the qualities of human dignity that liberalism prizes. The torturer inflicts pain one-on-one, deliberately, up close and personal, in order to break the spirit of the victim--in other words, to dominate the victim. The relationship between them becomes a parody of friendship and intimacy: intimacy transformed into its inverse image, where the torturer focuses on the victim's body with the intensity of a lover, except that every bit of that focus is bent to causing pain and hurting the victim's spirit.

we judge right and wrong against the baseline of whatever we have come to consider "normal" behavior, and if the norm shifts in the direction of violence, we will come to tolerate and accept violence as a normal response. The psychological mechanisms for this re-normalization have been studied for more than half a century, and by now they are reasonably well understood. Rather than detour into psychological theory, however, I will illustrate the point with the most salient example .... This is the famous Stanford Prison Experiment. Male volunteers were divided randomly into two groups who would simulate the guards and inmates in a mock prison. Within a matter of days, the inmates began acting like actual prison inmates-- enraged, and anxious. And the guards began to abuse the inmates to such an alarming degree that the researchers had to halt the two-week experiment after just seven days. In the words of the experimenters:

The use of power was self-aggrandising and self-perpetuating. The guard power, derived initially from an arbitrary label, was intensified whenever there was any perceived threat by the prisoners and this new level subsequently became the baseline from which further hostility and harassment would begin... . The absolute level of aggression as well as the more subtle and "creative" forms of aggression manifested, increased in a spiralling function.

It took only five days before a guard, who prior to the experiment described himself as a pacifist, was forcing greasy sausages down the throat of a prisoner who refused to eat; and in less than a week, the guards were placing bags over prisoners' heads, making them naked , and sexually humiliating them in ways reminiscent of Abu Ghraib.

Explanation:

Agreee

Torture used to be incompatible with American values. Our Bill of Rights forbids cruel and unusual punishment, and that has come to include all forms of corporal punishment except prison and mortality by methods purported to be painless. Americans and our government have historically condemned states that torture; we have granted asylum or refuge to those who fear it. The Senate ratified the Convention Against Torture, Congress enacted antitorture legislation, and judicial opinions spoke of "the dastardly and totally inhuman act of torture ” Then came September 11.

8 0
3 years ago
Have a nice day! Keep up the good work and eat some cookies!!
lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

TYSM il eat some cookies fs

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(B) How could U.S. workers possibly compete with foreign workers who are making wages that are only one-fifth of the wages of U.
KonstantinChe [14]

The correct answer to this open question is this.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The way U.S. workers could possibly compete with foreign workers who are making wages that are only one-fifth of the wages of U.S. workers is the following.

US workers have to demonstrate their value, supported by their experience and academic preparation.

It is clear that immigrant workers are going to accept low-paid jobs or less amount of money for the work they do. That has made some US companies prefer hiring immigrants. But let's accept it, there are many jobs that many Americans are not willing to do. We are basically talking about works in the factories, in some industries, in construction, or in housekeeping jobs.

In the corporate world, white Americans still dominate the management and directive roles. There are just a few immigrants that are at the top of the hierarchy, however, the next generation of immigrants are pushing hard(sons and daughters of immigrants).

And competence is good. So American people and youngsters in general, have to be conscious of this situation and try harder. In the end, up until today, American companies still prefer US citizens to manage companies and favor them when deciding who is going to escalate in the corporate ladder.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is the best reason for researching and comparing colleges’ curricula before making a final decision?
    11·2 answers
  • Which factor played a major role in the decline of the Safavid Empire?
    10·2 answers
  • If a sailboat and a motorboat are both underway when is the sailboat the give way vessel
    10·1 answer
  • What is MLS?
    11·1 answer
  • In your opinion, should the government control population in their countries? Why or why not?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a benefit of international trade ?
    14·2 answers
  • A boy was at a carnival and went to a booth where a man said to the boy, "If I write your exact weight on this piece of paper th
    7·1 answer
  • Free points c cds cxcxcxvc
    11·2 answers
  • A ball is sitting on a smooth level roadAfter the ball is pushed, it rolls along the asphalt surface a constant speed as it enco
    7·1 answer
  • How are the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (part of the brain that uses reason), Orbitofrontal Cortex (part of the brain that us
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!