The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The president's constitutional powers give him world influence as well as a domestic influence because the President of the United States plays many key roles that grant him powers to efficiently and effectively do his job in the US and abroad.
The President of the United States is the head of the Executive branch. It is the most important figure of the nation and is the leader of the country. He is the Chief Diplomat, Commander in Chief, and Chief Executive, head of the state, and has the power to veto bills and return them to Congress. That is why he is the most respected man because he is the image of the country to other world leaders.
So as Chief diplomat he has the power to sign treaties and negotiate with foreign leaders and look for the benefit of the US economic and political interests around the world. As the head of the state, he can make tough decisions to protect the nation and create new opportunities for the American people.
Although the US President cannot declare war (that is a power of Congress) as the commander-in-chief he can send troops to other countries to exert pressure, protect people, or defend the interests of the country.
Answer:
people management
Explanation:
well, in my own opinion, people or individual performance plays an essential role in development especially in fast developing countries today, because the world wouldnt be where it is now if not for skilled, brilliant and creative people who were able to harness the ideas to better the human kind
Answer:
C. It enacted the idea of nullification and declared the law null and void
Explanation:
The tariff of abominations, effectively increase the import tax for foreign products. This legislation affected a lot of states in the south which at that time imported large portion of their raw materials from Great Britain and France.
In response to this, Several southern states outright refused to follow the federal legislations regarding this tariff.
They argued that the Tariff of Abominations was unconstitutional and they refused to implemented within their region. This refusal is what commonly considered as 'Declaring the law null and void'