Check the picture below.
so the shape is really 4 triangles with a base of 2 and a height of 4 each, and 2 squares tha are 4x4.
![\bf \stackrel{\textit{area of the 4 triangles}}{4\left[\cfrac{1}{2}(2)(4) \right]}~~+~~\stackrel{\textit{area of the two squares}}{2(4\cdot 4)}\implies 16+32\implies 48](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Barea%20of%20the%204%20triangles%7D%7D%7B4%5Cleft%5B%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%282%29%284%29%20%5Cright%5D%7D~~%2B~~%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Barea%20of%20the%20two%20squares%7D%7D%7B2%284%5Ccdot%204%29%7D%5Cimplies%2016%2B32%5Cimplies%2048)
Answer: This is what I get.
Step-by-step explanation:
Option A
The restaurant Manager can afford at most 10 employees for the day
<em><u>Solution:</u></em>
Given that restaurant manager can spend at most $600 a day for operating costs and payroll
It costs $100 each day to operate the bank and $50 dollars a day for each employee
The given inequality is:

Where , "x" is the number of employees per day
Let us solve the inequality for "x"

Add -100 on both sides of inequality

Divide by 50 on both sides of inequality

Hence the restaurant Manager can afford at most 10 employees for the day
Thus option A is correct
Answer:
Calculating (5 x 2) violates the order of operations
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the order of operations, multiplies all have equal priority. Therefore, they must be evaluated left to right, not right to left. Evaluating (5 x 2) first is incorrect, and instead (9 x 5) should be calculated first.
Answer:
9r
Step-by-step explanation:
4r+9r-11r+7r
Combine like terms
13r -11r+7r
2r+7r
9r