President Theodore Roosevelt said that forests could be set aside at no expense in the D. West.
<h3>Which are had not suffered from excessive lumbering in the early 1900s?</h3>
President Theodore Roosevelt spoke of how forests in the Western United States were still in good condition because they had not been destroyed by timber companies.
This meant that preserving these forests could be done at little expense as there is no need to replant them. This was the opposite of conditions in the East where timber companies had destroyed a lot of forests.
Find out more on forest conservation in America at brainly.com/question/28272015
#SPJ1
False. The origins of this slogan come from a World Trade Organization protest in Seattle, Washington, this protest was also known as, "The Battle in Seattle". The movement attempts to increase awareness of worker rights, while diminishing the the importance of globalization and capitalism. As such, Republicans, who are traditionally capitalists, would not use this phrase.
The answer is D. The union won despite many casualties
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare and Contrast the words of the song to the views of U.S. Government officials of the late 1800s and early 1900s and with the text of the Dawes Act.
Ok, first we have to say the m¿name of the song that is going to be compared. It is "Don't Drink that Water," performed by David Mattews Band.
Part of the lyrics says the following<em>."What were you expecting? Not room for both. Jus room for me....Yes, I will call this home...You have been banished..."</em>
This song can be compared to the Dawes Act in that this act broke up the Native tribes to support the "Americanization" of the Native Indians and the settling of the white Americans in their territories.
It was Massachusetts legislator Henry Dawes who supported the Dawes Act in 1887, a piece of legislation known as the General Allotment Act.
It's approximately 450-1450 AD
