1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mixer [17]
3 years ago
14

Do you think the effect of British Colonialism small in India was positive or more negative? why?

History
1 answer:
kirill [66]3 years ago
7 0
It was negative because of the British invaders that where trying to take control of the colonies  <span />
You might be interested in
How did the french and indian war change the geographic boundaries of the 13 colonies
BARSIC [14]
<span>It was a war next to the colonies, started by the colonies. Colonial soldiers fought in the was alongside British regulars. And the threat of enemy natives caused Britain to put a protective detail of soldiers in the colonies to be payed for by a modification in the existing tax of sugar, which actually reduced the tax.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What skill best prepared Dwight D. Eisenhower for helping resolve conflicts between leaders of national armies?
Greeley [361]

Answer:

The answer is C. his diplomatic manner

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What methods were used by the Ottomans to defeat Constantinople?
Pie

Answer:

massive cannons were fired at constantinoples great walls.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes the South in the years leading up to the Civil War?
earnstyle [38]

Answer:

B

largely urban, with the majority of families owning slaves

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the treaty become activated as soon as he signed it?<br> Where is that addressed?
nata0808 [166]

The German delegates signed the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919, in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles, after attempting to negotiate some of the more harsh conditions but failing and facing threats of renewed hostilities should they not sign.

NO, when President Wilson signed the pact, it did not immediately become US policy. The pact was not ratified by the Senate. This is also covered in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, which grants the Senate the power to approve treaties that the President has negotiated. The President shall have the authority to make treaties with the advice and consent of the Senate, provided that two-thirds of the senators present agree, according to the full phrase in that section of the Constitution.

The terms of the peace between Germany and the victorious Allies were set forth in the Treaty of Versailles, which was signed in 1919 in the Palace of Versailles in Paris.

The peace agreement known as the Treaty of Versailles was signed in the aftermath of World War One, in the midst of the Russian Revolution and other significant Russian events, in 1918. The treaty between Germany and the Allies was signed at the enormous Versailles Palace close to Paris, thus its name.

Learn more about the Treaty of Versailles here:

brainly.com/question/11891946

#SPJ9

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Is Malcolm X's real last name simply the letter "X"
    14·2 answers
  • What was OPEC protesting when it imposed its embargo?
    5·2 answers
  • What two nations emerged as superpowers after world war 2
    9·2 answers
  • Why was the election of 1860 known as the final straw leading to the civil war
    11·1 answer
  • Type of government in great britain during ww2
    6·1 answer
  • What were some examples of unfair taxes and laws from England?What war started this?
    13·1 answer
  • Write an editorial from the perspective of someone who supports the Union.
    8·1 answer
  • HURRY IM ON A TIME LIMIT
    6·1 answer
  • Please help I got stuck on this question ​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following WAS NOT an effect of the invention of the printing press in the 15th century?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!