1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariulka [41]
3 years ago
9

What arguments do you think there were for carter's decision to grant amnesty to americans who had evaded the draft?

History
1 answer:
inysia [295]3 years ago
4 0
As a candidate, Carter himself had said he advocated "pardon" (a term he preferred to amnesty).  He said, "I do advocate a pardon for draft evaders. ... Now is the time to heal our country after the Vietnam war. ... I hope to bring about an end to the divisiveness that has occurred in our country as a result of the Vietnam war."

On his second day in office, President Carter in fact did pardon draft dodgers. This applied only to civilians who evaded the draft.  It did not apply to active duty military personnel who went absent without leave (AWOL) or deserted their units during the war.
You might be interested in
The Great Compromise called for which of the following? A A bicameral legislature B A president and a vice president C A unicame
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

a because back in the day they was bicameral

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Slave who sued for his freedom in what became a famous Supreme Court Act
WITCHER [35]

Dred Scott (c. 1799 – September 17, 1858) was an enslaved African American man in the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as the "Dred Scott case".


4 0
3 years ago
History question HELP!!
larisa86 [58]

Answer:

Authoritarianism is a type of government where there is limited political freedoms. So its number three

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Scarce resources and social rewards are not the basis of ascribed statuses. True or False?
Over [174]

Answer:

  False.

Explanation:

  Ascribed statuses are the social status a person is assigned at birth or assumed involuntarily later in life. These rigid social designators remain fixed throughout the entire life and are inseparable from the positive and negative stereotypes linked with.

  It is based on gender, race, family, origins, and ethnic backgrounds. There is no biological basis or universal truth for assigning these societal rankings for individuals.

  I hope this answer helps you.  

6 0
3 years ago
Now, write two paragraphs using your outline.
Rina8888 [55]

<u>ubii pirfhwuiq3hr4gyu5q;tge45rdgrvi45g3qhwaouwBUT42IW</u>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was severe an appropriate name for the overseer?
    13·1 answer
  • The president executes the laws in his or her role as
    15·1 answer
  • Which would an anthropologist learn by studying an archaeological site where many animal bones were found
    10·1 answer
  • For many cities in the __________ region of texas, spanish is the primary language, catholicism is the dominant religion, and in
    14·1 answer
  • What did expansionists mean by the term Manifest Destiny?
    6·1 answer
  • URGENT,how successfully did elizabeth I deal with the threat of invasion,45 POINTS
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes consumer spending trends during
    7·1 answer
  • How did the French and Indian War cause tension between the British and the colonists?
    15·1 answer
  • What metaphors does King use to describe segregation and living in poverty?
    8·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. What is the purpose of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!