Answer:
both market research and marketing research APEX
Explanation:
Answer:
Price increases and the effect on quantity cannot be determined.
Explanation:
Demand
This is simply defined as the combining of desire, ability, and willingness to buy a product. The quantity demandedbof a commodity is the amount demanded at any given price.
Supply
This is simply defined as the amount of product rendered for sale at all different prices in a market. The quantity supplied is commonly refered to as the amount that producers bring to the market at at any given price.
Demand increased due to the new dish, while supply has decreased due to the goat disease. Price will therefore increase, but the effect on quantity depends on the magnitude of the impact of these two events.
<span>Nutrition professionals working in the nutrition education.The American Dietetic Association (ADA) is the organization, this organization of food and nutritional professionals is committed to improving the nation's health. And this is the large organization of food and nutrition professionals.</span>
Answer:
Contingent liabilities refer to those obligations which might arise in the near future based upon the happening or non happening of a certain event and it's outcome.
Such liabilities are recorded if there is likeliness of an event happening and when they can be reasonably quantified and estimated.
In the given case, the automobile manufacturer will probably be required to recall it's products. The amount can be estimated.
In such cases, such expense is to be recognized in the income statement and at the same time a liability for such expenses needs to be created in the balance sheet. Product recall refers to replacement of defective products by the manufacturer. It is similar to a warranty.
Reporting on Dec 31 would be as follows,
Warranty Expense A/C Dr. $2.5
To Warranty Liability $2.5
(being product recall liability for for 2.5 million created)
Answer:
an unconscionable contract
Explanation:
Unconscionable contracts are contracts that are considered so unjust, unfair and one-sided that they shock the conscience. This type of contracts are usually voidable and not enforceable.
In this case, the seller had the superior bargaining power, because the other party didn't speak English, and took advantage of that position to make an extremely unfair deal. A court would void this transaction.
