1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zlopas [31]
3 years ago
5

Read the passage.

English
2 answers:
julsineya [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

dnkdjsb I will get back to you with a new one is great and I will be back in the office in a few hours I will get it to be able to do it when we

Anna007 [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Katie’s blanket, which she’s had since she was four, is starting to look scruffy.

Explanation:

I just finished the test.

You might be interested in
how does it feel when another person doesn't see something the way you do how can you address this differences in perceptions​
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

omo I don't know but what I tell you it is real and if it does happen but it's not must that somewhere else sees what you can yeah

6 0
2 years ago
What was the main flaw in the sepreme courts reasoning in Plessy v. Ferguson
devlian [24]
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms. 

<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>

<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>

<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>

<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>

<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
8 0
2 years ago
Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

could've

Explanation:

Could've is a contraction of could have, which is always correct. Could of will never be correct, and could of've is simply not a real term.

6 0
1 year ago
True or False: You need a computer program to create digital art.
loris [4]
<h3>false, because we can use apps from mobile.......</h3>

<h2>follow me and make as brilliest......,..............</h2>

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What excuse did Mr Easton make to say goodbye to the young girl?answer the question with reference to hearts and hands story
Sedbober [7]

Mr. Easton gave the excuse that Mr. Marshal wants to smoke therefore he must go with him as they were handcuffed. He said to her that it’s his duties and orders because of which he must leave.

The story “Hearts and Hands” by Edgar Allen Poe deals with the theme of outer appearance with which most of the people judge others. The story ends with the conclusion that appearances may be deceptive which alters the real self of a man. Since Mr. Marshal had a dull face and was not attractive because of which the girl got convinced that he was the prisoner. On the other hand, Mr. Easton looked attractive for Miss Fairchild. She wished to build a further relation with Mr. Easton but failed in doing so. Mr. Easton didn’t want his reality to be highlighted in front of her because of which he got off from the train.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Midnight News
    5·2 answers
  • What is the least effctive way to creat balance and flow in your life
    5·1 answer
  • What does? What 3 statements mean?<br><br> Need ASAP
    13·1 answer
  • 50 oraciones en negativo en ingles con she, he e it por favorrrrr, se los agradeceria muchisisisisimo
    8·1 answer
  • Defective house wiring is an example of
    6·2 answers
  • Sandra was quite overwhelmed by her final exam. Many of the test questions were difficult to answer, and she felt like she would
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is most likely to be a key part of the conflict in a story?
    15·2 answers
  • Mrs. Stevenson dial the operator? from wrong number
    11·1 answer
  • How does writing a memoir help the author convey her story? Cite evidence from the selection to support your response. from: chi
    6·1 answer
  • Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer meaning
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!