Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option C.
Slightly above their costs in the long run.
Explanation: The monopolistic competitive firms are those who produce the similar products and service but without perfect substitute. The monopolistic firms are closely related with the business strategy of brand differentiation. Basically, the monopolistic competition is the combine of monopoly and perfect market. The monopolistic competition don't have the the power to control the market price like the monopoly system.
When the profit matter comes to the business, the monopolistic firms earn profits slightly above their costs in the long run. Because barriers to entry are low, other firms have an incentive to enter the market, increasing the competition. As a result to survive in the market the profit margin gets lower. Therefore, they just make the profit above their costs.
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
<span>A Confederation. Despite the actual grouping of states into one "unit", the idea of a confederacy is to let the states essentially rule for themselves.Sovereign simply means self-ruling which is what each state would follow under union beliefs.There is no established law of the land for any unions as it would defeat the purpose.</span>
Answer:
A. Both cases established limits on public schools' actions based on the First Amendment
