A.) "Below-Average" <span>generally switch companies easily
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer and Explanation:
In the given case, the second will would be destroyed non-intentionally by the testatrix that represent the person who writes the will. Also the second will would have be intended to revoke the first will
In addition to this, Testatrix intends the second will to be value also at the same time she dont want the first will to be probated
So the second will would be upheld because of testamentary motive.
It is a true statement that a typical written contract or agreement must contain a description of the consideration promised in order to satisfy the Statute of Frauds.
<h3>What is the
Statute of Frauds?</h3>
This refers to the legal concept that requires certain types of contracts to be executed in writing.
In the legal field, the Statute of Frauds covers contracts for the sale of land, agreements involving goods worth over $500 and contracts lasting one year or more.
Most times, the Statute of Frauds can be satisfied by any signed writing that:
- identifies the subject matter of the contract
- is sufficient to indicate that a contract exists
- states with reasonable certainty the material terms of the contract.
Read more about Statute of Frauds
brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. WIP InventoryminusMolding
Explanation:
Crediting is the amount or the items leaving the account, so since the Molding inventory is the one letting go of things, this is in the positive part of the T graph, so since it is having a credit, since it is providing it, the C. WIP InventoryminusMolding is the one that is being credited, on the other hand you should debit the WIP InventoryminusColoring since it is the one receiving the products.
