In many developing countries, the share paid in a deficit budget was as much as the united amount for water, health, agriculture, roads, transport and finance.
<h3>What is the surplus and deficit budget?</h3>
A budget surplus is when extra money is gone over in a budget after expenses are paid. A budget deficit ensues when the federal government spends more money than it contains in revenue. Internal loans that drive up for the bulk of public debt are further divided into two broad types – marketable and non-marketable debt.
Anyone having borrowed funds or interests from another owes a debt and is beneath obligation to return the goods or repay the funds, usually with interest. For governments, the demand to borrow to finance a deficit budget has led to the growth of various states of national debt.
To learn more about the deficit budget visit the link
brainly.com/question/10876388
#SPJ4
Answer:
A group bonus system
Explanation:
In relationship-oriented cultures, group bonuses are very common, and they are not like the regular yearly bonuses given out at Christmas, specially in Japan. In Japan, there are two bonuses per year, one paid during mid-year and the other one at the end of the year. These bonuses can amount to 3-6 months worth of salary, but they are also paid to the whole group of workers. That means that either everyone in the team gets a bonus or no one does.
Relationship-oriented cultures are based upon the well being, motivation and satisfaction of the whole team.
Answer:
C. Helps balance the positive and negative consequences of a decision.
Explanation:
Answer:
the minimum price it should charge is $40 per unit.
Explanation:
Minimum Transfer Price = Variable Costs - Internal Savings + Opportunity Cost
<em>Note : Division A has capacity available to meet B's requirements therefore there is no opportunity cost</em>.
There are Internal savings of $5 as A's variable costs will be $5 less per unit.
Minimum Transfer Price = $45 - $5
= $40
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
