The long march was a tactic of retreat into the mountains so that they could survive because they were facing elimination.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
First of all, who would be the one giving the task?
Second of all, the people must be able to accept change for them to experience change.
Third of all, who would take on the task? Which country/people? Who would provide the resources, fundings, & volunteers to help "improve" the world.
Fourth, what kind of improvements are we talking about? Is it really beneficial, or does it just help with foreign government agendas?
Fifth, would there be any "extra's" that those parts of the world have to take on? Would they be called upon later on to help even when they cannot? Help usually have strings attached, and they would force obligation on the beneficiary to return the favor at a later time.
Of course, if the parts of the world wants to be improved, and there is the resources and funds to do so, then yes, Roosevelt is right in "improving" those parts of the world.
~
Well we know that it is not A or C, Reason: Some states have up to 5m people in it. (For example about 8 live in just new York alone.)
And we also know its not 10 billion. Reason for this: Scientist have proven that there is no more then 8 billion people today.
And so now we got 6.5 billion is the closest, the real number is about 7.5 billion.
<span />
Of course! A published poet is a very good thing and I think itnis very remarkable
According to political scientist Brian R. Dirck, the most famous executive order was by President Abraham Lincoln, when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863: The Emancipation Proclamation was an executive order, itself a rather unusual thing in those days.
