The qualities of effective summaries of informational texts is that it includes main idea and supporting details and should be written in complete sentences.
Given are four options out which two are the qualities of effective summaries of informational texts.
Effective summaries of informational texts refer to the summary of an article, essay or a blog which explains the idea of the text in brief.
It uses complete and correct language. The summary includes the main idea of the text. It is then followed by the supporting details in brief.
The summary does not include any personal opinions and beliefs because it is a formal piece of writing. The language used is formal and no quotations are used.
Hence the correct options are (1) and (2).
Learn more about Summary Writing on brainly.com/question/25605883
#SPJ10
<span>The form that a verb takes to ask a question is indicative. You use just the regular forms of a verb to ask the question, as in this example: What do you need? Subjunctive mood is used when talking about possibilities, or wishes, as in "I wish you would stop doing that," where "you would stop" is subjunctive. Imperative is the form you use to give orders, such as in" Close the door!" Passive form, as opposed to active, is found in this example: A book is being read by me - as opposed to - I am reading a book - which is active.</span>
<span>Using these words allows Hamilton to describe the powers of these branches of government in familiar terms so that he can then contrast them with the powers he envisions for an independent judiciary.
</span><span>By expressing complete certainty in his position, Hamilton presents his argument in favor of an independent judiciary as one to which no logical objection exists.
</span>
It is B. The semicolon should be between everywhere and it's. I.e. "....everywhere;it''s..."
Answer: Yes, If punishments were harsh enough, there would probably be no crime.
Explanation: If people who disobeyed the law were strongly punished, then it would be less likely that people would break the rules of the government. Less people would speed, and more people would probably start being more serious about it. For example, crimes like bank robberies would probably become less likely if they had to pay off all of the money they stole. Being punished for certain things could be harsher. If this happens, the amount of crime will probably decrease, but it will not completely disappear. This is why I think If punishments were harsh enough, there would be no crime.
