1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ExtremeBDS [4]
3 years ago
10

What were the major points of disagreement between the federalist and the anti-federalists regarding the U.S. constitution? How

was this dispute resolved?
History
2 answers:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
6 0

The Constitution required ratification, those who favored it were known as Federalist and those who did not favor ratification were known as Anti- Federalists. Among the major points of disagreement between both parties were that Anti- Federalists attacked the weakest point of the Constitution, the lack of Bill of Rights, they stated that a bill of rights was important to safeguard individual liberty and the states would lose their right of creating they own laws, because they feared the creation of a national government would have power over the states. On the other hand, Federalists argued that a bill of rights was not needed because the powers not given to the federal government remained on people and states’ hands, they stated that the rejection of the Constitution would result in anarchy.  

The dispute was ultimately resolved, it took 10 months for the first nine states to ratify, being Delaware and New Hampshire the first and ninth states to ratify. The creation of the 12 amendments, from which 10 of them would become the bill of rights led to the ratification of North Carolina. Finally, Rhode Island called a ratifying convention where it ratified the constitution by a narrow margin.  


QveST [7]3 years ago
5 0

The differences between the Federalists and the Antifederalists are vast and at times complex. Federalists’ beliefs could be better described as nationalist. The Federalists were instrumental in 1787 in shaping the new US Constitution, which strengthened the national government at the expense, according to the Antifederalists, of the states and the people. The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution, but they never organized efficiently across all thirteen states, and so had to fight the ratification at every state convention. Their great success was in forcing the first Congress under the new Constitution to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated.

The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. They include the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments. To accommodate Anti-Federalist concerns of excessive federal power, the Bill of Rights also reserves any power that is not given to the federal government to the states and to the people.

Since its adoption, the Bill of Rights has become the most important part of the Constitution for most Americans. In Supreme Court cases, the Amendments are debated more frequently than the Articles. They have been cited to protect the free speech of Civil Rights activists, protect Americans from unlawful government surveillance, and grant citizens Miranda rights during arrest. It is impossible to know what our republic would look like today without the persistence of the Anti-Federalists over two hundred years ago.


You might be interested in
a historian interviews two people who fought during a certain battle during the gulf war. one person says u.s. forces fired firs
kotykmax [81]
They should interview other people who fought in that same war ( which would be back up witness for these two different accounts). So whoever has the most back up witnesses must be telling the truth ( also make sure the other people you interview don't know they are back up witness).
8 0
3 years ago
1. Why is the United States interested in oil in the Middle East?
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

United States has about 25 billion barrels worth of proven oil reserves in US soil. The United States on average per year uses about 6.7 billion barrels of oil in vehicle fuel, certain liquid products, make technology, etc. That generates the oil industry about $750-800 billion dollars worth of oil. US already controls oil reserves in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and UAE. That's why those countries have developed so much after the Gulf War. This can gain massive profits to oil companies around Western nations. Gas companies like BP, ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, HESS, and so much other companies. Controlling middle eastern oil reserves promises Western oil industry humongous profits and promising futures for the next 50-60 years. Most people don't notice this. But the war benefits us a lot. The war also helps gains in weapons industry,keep dollar value, etc.

Sorry if confusing. May have left out some info. This is me trying to simplify everything. US Middle East interests is a very long a complex history.

Honest answer is oil. Yes, we have seven times the reserves here, but the left refuses to let us explore and develop that oil. In the USA we have over 400 years of oil in the Green River reserve alone.

I am not sure if this is what you want but hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the economic goals correlates with the explanation "decisions about how much workers should receive in income"?
natali 33 [55]
The correct answer should probably be something like equity. If you kept equity in mind then you could create a way to see how much they should receive because equity would insure everyone lived fairly well and had enough to live. Of course, some workers might want even more but that would be up to them, not up to the employer.
5 0
3 years ago
What was an unintended consequence of US corporations growing larger?
sergejj [24]

Answer:D. Us jobs were lost as corporation took advantage of cheap overseas labor

Explanation:took the test

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What caused the fall of the gupta empire?
padilas [110]
"The Huna People, also known as Huns, invaded Gupta territory and caused significant damage to the empire. The Gupta Empire ended in 550 CE, when it disintegrated into regional kingdoms after a series of weak rulers and invasions from the east, west, and north."
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me with this
    14·1 answer
  • How did Emilio Aguinaldo’s opinion of the united states changed after the Spanish-American war
    15·1 answer
  • Locke, Hobbes, and Montesquieu all supported which of the following theories of government?
    10·1 answer
  • I NEED ASAP....... Select the correct answer. Israel has a president and a prime minister. The legislature in Israel is called t
    8·1 answer
  • Only 2 questions please help 1.what was one major similarity that spanish dutch french and english 2.Which of the following were
    12·1 answer
  • How did father charles coughlin gather support for his critisisms of the new deal?
    8·1 answer
  • Approximately how many people live on wake island?
    11·2 answers
  • How have our economic goals changed over the last 100 years?
    5·2 answers
  • Do you know this question
    12·1 answer
  • HELP ME PLEASE ITS URGENT!!
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!