Answer:
The two triangles are related by angles, so the triangles are similar but not proven to be congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Because the triangles have the same angles, they are congruent. The definition of congruence is if you take a shape and scale it up or down (or keep it the same) therefore, they are congruent.
Hope this helped, have a nice day
EDIT: I screwed up, I thought it was supposed to be similar. These triangles are SIMILAR not congruent. The actual answer is they are related by AAA similarity but they are similar, but they are not proven to be congruent. Hope this clears it up, and sorry.
~cloud
Based on the diagram and the ratio of width and height in it, the width that Mr. Howell should make his table is 48 inches .
<h3>How wide should Mr. Howell's table be?</h3>
The width of the table in the diagram is 12 cm and the height is 6cm.
This means that the ratio of width to height is:
12 : 6
2 : 1
As Mr. Howell wants his table to be 24 inches high, the width of the table would be:
2 : 1
x : 24
Cross-multiply to get:
x = 48 inches
Find out more on ratios at brainly.com/question/20594266
#SPJ1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
d= 2r
therefore the radius is 1
Answer:
None really look like a solution. I mean, that's what I think, honestly.
