Last sentence
explain: sentence 1 didn't close off the speech marks sentence 2 speech marks weren't necessary as it was indirect speech and sentence 3 did not put a comma at the end of the speech marks.
hope that helps!
You could seek the help of a tutor to understand more about the class, and learn new things.
<span>semantic fallacy
</span>
A “slam dunk” argument is likely the product of a fallacious syllogism. The word “slam dunk” has actually originated from the basketball games. This word is used to show people a forceful move in the game of basketball. The player puts the ball in the basket with full power and force. It is often considered a dramatic shot in the game. In literary sense, the word can be used to express violent actions as well. It can also be used to describe a vicious fight among individuals. <span> </span>
The answer i think it would be is untruthful
