If we're talking about diseases they were worse off, but if we're talking about relationships, the British had a terrible relationship with the natives and treated the natives as obstacles. but the French had trading relationships with the natives and became allies.
Answer:
1. He was A French military officer; he also was a political leader. He rose to prominence during the French revolution. Many of his campaigns were a success. He led to power by starting off as a military officer.
2. Napoleon had stabilized France, He brought it in good reforms, but not the way the French Revolution wanted it to be. By taking power, he didn't share the power equally, back to what had started the Revolution with Estates and Political Inequality. Another thing they argued about was that Napoleon was the best of Military leader of all time.
It was known as the<span> Abraham Lincoln Brigade...hope that i helped :D</span>
Answer:
Among its negative effects, the Compromise of 1950 led to increased division between North and South because of the provisions requiring Northern cooperation in the capture of fugitive enslaved people.
...and...
Among its negative effects, the Compromise of 1850 led to increased division between North and South because of the provisions requiring Northern cooperation in the capture of fugitive enslaved people.
Great Britain and the Soviet Union later on received lend-lease aid. <span />