1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VashaNatasha [74]
3 years ago
6

What was the status of the Church in French society before the revolution? How did this status change through the different phas

es of the revolution?
History
1 answer:
tangare [24]3 years ago
5 0
Religion was more than very important to the people of this time. The church has a very high significant status before the revolution. As time went on religion was a big deal but not as big pre revolution so the churches lost their high social status though time and it kept going down as time went on. 
You might be interested in
"I was glad that I did not live in slavery times. But i knew that conditions of life for my family and me were in some ways not
Elodia [21]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

because if anyone who is slavery will not happy in here life and even he or she thinking about how he or she will be happy

3 0
3 years ago
What did the North Atlantic Treaty Organization want to keep the Soviet from doing?
Mamont248 [21]
If i'm correct They wanted to keep the Soviet from expanding

6 0
3 years ago
Think about the loopholes built into Prohibition laws. Even though alcohol was “prohibited,” which of these things were American
gtnhenbr [62]

The correct answer is A) Drink alcohol and D) Buy alcohol for medical reasons.

The 18th amendment strictly prohibited the "sale, distribution, and manufacturing" of alcohol. However, it says nothing about drinking alcohol within the amendment. Along with this, doctors still had the ability to give citizens alcohol if it was for medical purposes. This resulted in thousands of Americans gaining access to alcohol legally during the 1920's.

3 0
2 years ago
And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government, and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highne
gavmur [86]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. That the pretended power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament is illegal.

2. That the pretended power of dispensing with the laws, or the execution of law by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal.

3. That the commission for erecting the late court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious.

4. That levying money for or to the use of the crown by pretense of prerogative, without grant of parliament, for longer time or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal.

5. That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.

6. That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of parliament, is against law.

7. That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions, and as allowed by law.

8. That election of members of parliament ought to be free.

9. That the freedom of speech, and debates or proceedings in parliament, ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.

10. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

11. That jurors ought to be duly impaneled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders.

12. That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.

13. And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening, and preserving of the laws, parliament ought to be held frequently.                                                  

sry if its not the answer you were looking for. It worked for me but it might just be my thing sry again if its not

5 0
2 years ago
Why did chiang kai-shek believe the Communists were more dangerous than the Japanese
nadya68 [22]
Because he sees Japanese as disease from the outside but the communist is a disease from the inside and need to destroy before becoming an unstoppable force. Also the communist is a blocking of his plan to unify China in one flag to defeat the Japanese forces in the country. 
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Witch of the following was included in Patrick Henry’s Virginia resolves
    15·1 answer
  • Plz answer need help thanks
    7·1 answer
  • Was there a trojan war? If so .what was its likely cause
    13·1 answer
  • Aristocrats felt threatened by the industrial era because _____.
    6·1 answer
  • The U.S. government supported the automobile by subsidizing
    8·1 answer
  • 27) Where _______
    5·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    8·1 answer
  • Compare the lifestyles of hunter-gatherers with those of settlers of early agricultural communities. The Neolithic Revolution
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me with this.
    6·1 answer
  • How can the discovery of new artifacts change interpretations of history over time?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!